E. A. Hoffman

555 total citations
24 papers, 198 citations indexed

About

E. A. Hoffman is a scholar working on Aerospace Engineering, Materials Chemistry and Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality. According to data from OpenAlex, E. A. Hoffman has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 198 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Aerospace Engineering, 20 papers in Materials Chemistry and 6 papers in Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality. Recurrent topics in E. A. Hoffman's work include Nuclear reactor physics and engineering (20 papers), Nuclear Materials and Properties (13 papers) and Fusion materials and technologies (9 papers). E. A. Hoffman is often cited by papers focused on Nuclear reactor physics and engineering (20 papers), Nuclear Materials and Properties (13 papers) and Fusion materials and technologies (9 papers). E. A. Hoffman collaborates with scholars based in United States. E. A. Hoffman's co-authors include Weston M. Stacey, J. Mandrekas, Günter Kessler, Nolan E. Hertel, T. A. Taiwo, C. Grandy, A. L. Qualls, Jess C Gehin, David A. Petti and Thomas J. O’Connor and has published in prestigious journals such as Biology, Progress in Nuclear Energy and Annals of Nuclear Energy.

In The Last Decade

E. A. Hoffman

23 papers receiving 190 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
E. A. Hoffman United States	9	168	165	67	37	12	24	198
D. Panayotov Spain	10	162 1.0×	118 0.7×	42 0.6×	25 0.7×	20 1.7×	23	193
Nicholas Terranova Italy	9	122 0.7×	137 0.8×	31 0.5×	87 2.4×	12 1.0×	26	173
S. Noce Italy	9	199 1.2×	180 1.1×	34 0.5×	30 0.8×	7 0.6×	24	237
D.H. Berwald United States	7	168 1.0×	125 0.8×	70 1.0×	34 0.9×	8 0.7×	28	201
Vito Imbriani Italy	5	136 0.8×	117 0.7×	25 0.4×	17 0.5×	8 0.7×	10	161
A. Quartararo Italy	6	105 0.6×	89 0.5×	57 0.9×	13 0.4×	9 0.8×	33	147
H. Takei Japan	6	81 0.5×	114 0.7×	12 0.2×	61 1.6×	10 0.8×	20	149
P.D. Brennan United Kingdom	7	129 0.8×	65 0.4×	70 1.0×	13 0.4×	7 0.6×	15	156
J. Naish United Kingdom	9	128 0.8×	174 1.1×	68 1.0×	145 3.9×	7 0.6×	23	217
E. Vallone Italy	10	281 1.7×	182 1.1×	165 2.5×	25 0.7×	12 1.0×	49	320

Countries citing papers authored by E. A. Hoffman

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. A. Hoffman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. A. Hoffman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. A. Hoffman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. A. Hoffman

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. A. Hoffman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. A. Hoffman. The network helps show where E. A. Hoffman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of E. A. Hoffman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of E. A. Hoffman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of E. A. Hoffman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with E. A. Hoffman. E. A. Hoffman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Hoffman, E. A., et al.. (2025). Zebrafish (Danio rerio) Prefer Undisturbed Shoals over Shoals Exposed to the Synthetic Alarm Substance Hypoxanthine-3N-oxide (C5H4N4O2). Biology. 14(3). 233–233.

Hoffman, E. A., et al.. (2024). A Framework to Assess Advanced Reactor Spent Fuel Management Facility Deployment. Nuclear Technology. 210(9). 1602–1622. 4 indexed citations

Zhou, Jia, Nicolas Stauff, & E. A. Hoffman. (2023). ACCERT. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information). 1 indexed citations

Dixon, Brent, E. A. Hoffman, Bo Feng, et al.. (2020). Reassessing methods to close the nuclear fuel cycle. Annals of Nuclear Energy. 147. 107652–107652. 3 indexed citations

Heidet, F., C. Grandy, E. A. Hoffman, et al.. (2018). FASt TEst Reactor (FASTER) design overview. Progress in Nuclear Energy. 108. 465–473. 1 indexed citations

Petti, David A., Jess C Gehin, Hans D. Gougar, et al.. (2017). A Summary of the Department of Energy’s Advanced Demonstration and Test Reactor Options Study. Nuclear Technology. 199(2). 111–128. 31 indexed citations

Hoffman, E. A., et al.. (2016). Expanded analysis of transition to an alternative fuel cycle. 1790–1799. 1 indexed citations

Hoffman, E. A., et al.. (2013). Performance evaluation of two-stage fuel cycle from SFR to PWR. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information). 1 indexed citations

Moisseytsev, A., E. A. Hoffman, & C. Grandy. (2011). Selection of Core Outlet Temperature and Impacts on Fast Reactor Economics. Nuclear Technology. 173(3). 251–269. 3 indexed citations

10.

Taiwo, T. A., et al.. (2011). Impacts of Heterogeneous Recycle in Fast Reactors on Overall Fuel Cycle. Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology. 48(4). 472–478. 2 indexed citations

11.

Taiwo, T. A., E. A. Hoffman, Robert Hill, & Won Sik Yang. (2006). Evaluation of Long-Life Transuranics Breakeven and Burner Cores for Waste Minimization in a PB-GCFR Fuel Cycle. Nuclear Technology. 155(1). 55–66. 6 indexed citations

12.

Hoffman, E. A., Robert Hill, & T. A. Taiwo. (2005). Advanced LWR Multi-Recycle Concepts. Transactions of the American Nuclear Society. 93(1). 363–364. 1 indexed citations

13.

Stacey, Weston M., et al.. (2005). Sub-Critical Transmutation Reactors with Tokamak Fusion Neutron Sources. Fusion Science & Technology. 47(4). 1210–1218. 10 indexed citations

14.

Hoffman, E. A. & Weston M. Stacey. (2004). Nuclear Design and Analysis of the Fusion Transmutation of Waste Reactor. Fusion Science & Technology. 45(1). 51–54. 13 indexed citations

15.

Hoffman, E. A. & Weston M. Stacey. (2003). Comparative Fuel Cycle Analysis of Critical and Subcritical Fast Reactor Transmutation Systems. Nuclear Technology. 144(1). 83–106. 27 indexed citations

16.

Stacey, Weston M., et al.. (2002). A Fusion Transmutation of Waste Reactor. Fusion Science & Technology. 41(2). 116–140. 32 indexed citations

17.

Hoffman, E. A. & Weston M. Stacey. (2002). Nuclear and fuel cycle analysis for a fusion transmutation of waste reactor. Fusion Engineering and Design. 63-64. 87–91. 12 indexed citations

18.

Stacey, Weston M. & E. A. Hoffman. (2001). Tokamak Transmutation Facility Studies. Fusion Technology. 39(2P2). 525–529. 8 indexed citations

19.

Hoffman, E. A., Weston M. Stacey, & Nolan E. Hertel. (1997). Radioactive Waste Disposal Characteristics of Candidate Tokamak Demonstration Reactors. Fusion Technology. 31(1). 35–62. 10 indexed citations

20.

Stacey, Weston M., Nolan E. Hertel, & E. A. Hoffman. (1995). Radioactive waste produced by demonstration and commercial fusion reactors extrapolated from ITER and advanced databases. Fusion Engineering and Design. 29. 198–206. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact