Andrew Worrall

683 total citations
39 papers, 429 citations indexed

About

Andrew Worrall is a scholar working on Aerospace Engineering, Materials Chemistry and Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality. According to data from OpenAlex, Andrew Worrall has authored 39 papers receiving a total of 429 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 37 papers in Aerospace Engineering, 32 papers in Materials Chemistry and 13 papers in Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality. Recurrent topics in Andrew Worrall's work include Nuclear reactor physics and engineering (36 papers), Nuclear Materials and Properties (30 papers) and Nuclear and radioactivity studies (13 papers). Andrew Worrall is often cited by papers focused on Nuclear reactor physics and engineering (36 papers), Nuclear Materials and Properties (30 papers) and Nuclear and radioactivity studies (13 papers). Andrew Worrall collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Sweden. Andrew Worrall's co-authors include Jeffrey J. Powers, Kurt A. Terrani, G. Ivan Maldonado, Benjamin R. Betzler, Nicholas R. Brown, M. Todosow, Jess C Gehin, Nicolas Stauff, Randy Belles and Bo Feng and has published in prestigious journals such as Nuclear Engineering and Design, Progress in Nuclear Energy and Annals of Nuclear Energy.

In The Last Decade

Andrew Worrall

35 papers receiving 406 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Andrew Worrall United States 10 368 335 62 46 45 39 429
Eric P. Loewen United States 11 251 0.7× 247 0.7× 31 0.5× 26 0.6× 79 1.8× 31 331
Russell Gardner United States 8 284 0.8× 260 0.8× 43 0.7× 19 0.4× 31 0.7× 8 324
Е. О. Адамов Russia 9 231 0.6× 186 0.6× 65 1.0× 32 0.7× 49 1.1× 53 331
Y.I. Chang United States 10 476 1.3× 360 1.1× 58 0.9× 18 0.4× 189 4.2× 26 628
F. Heidet United States 10 243 0.7× 251 0.7× 41 0.7× 65 1.4× 33 0.7× 46 284
Sidik Permana Indonesia 11 346 0.9× 387 1.2× 57 0.9× 137 3.0× 31 0.7× 84 456
В. К. Афоничкин Russia 8 220 0.6× 164 0.5× 17 0.3× 28 0.6× 91 2.0× 15 309
Shinzo SAITO Japan 11 353 1.0× 320 1.0× 108 1.7× 30 0.7× 49 1.1× 25 443
Dwi Irwanto Indonesia 11 274 0.7× 290 0.9× 80 1.3× 116 2.5× 14 0.3× 71 337
A. Abdelghafar Galahom Egypt 16 601 1.6× 591 1.8× 78 1.3× 195 4.2× 21 0.5× 54 650

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Worrall

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Worrall's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Worrall with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Worrall more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Worrall

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Worrall. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Worrall. The network helps show where Andrew Worrall may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew Worrall

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew Worrall. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew Worrall based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew Worrall. Andrew Worrall is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Omitaomu, Olufemi A., et al.. (2022). Methods and system for siting advanced nuclear reactors and evaluating energy policy concerns. Progress in Nuclear Energy. 148. 104197–104197. 11 indexed citations
2.
Dixon, Brent, E. A. Hoffman, Bo Feng, et al.. (2020). Reassessing methods to close the nuclear fuel cycle. Annals of Nuclear Energy. 147. 107652–107652. 3 indexed citations
3.
Betzler, Benjamin R., et al.. (2019). Molten Salt Reactor Neutronic and Fuel Cycle Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analysis. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information). 1339–1342. 1 indexed citations
4.
Betzler, Benjamin R., et al.. (2019). Neural Network Approach to Model Mixed Oxide Fuel Cycles in Cyclus, a Nuclear Fuel Cycle Simulator. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information). 378–382.
5.
Worrall, Andrew, Benjamin R. Betzler, David Holcomb, et al.. (2018). Molten Salt Reactors and Associated Safeguards Challenges and Opportunities. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information). 1 indexed citations
6.
Brown, Nicholas R., Andrew Worrall, & M. Todosow. (2016). Fuel cycle performance of thermal spectrum small modular reactors. 2024–2031. 3 indexed citations
7.
Brown, Nicholas R., et al.. (2016). Identification of fuel cycle simulator functionalities for analysis of transition to a new fuel cycle. Annals of Nuclear Energy. 96. 88–95. 9 indexed citations
8.
Feng, Bo, Brent Dixon, J. Jacobson, et al.. (2016). Standardized verification of fuel cycle modeling. Annals of Nuclear Energy. 94. 300–312. 15 indexed citations
9.
Worrall, Andrew, et al.. (2016). The Reemergence of the Thorium Fuel Cycle: A Special Issue of Nuclear Technology. Nuclear Technology. 194(2). iii–iv. 3 indexed citations
10.
Hoffman, E. A., et al.. (2016). Expanded analysis of transition to an alternative fuel cycle. 1790–1799. 1 indexed citations
11.
Hu, Jianwei, et al.. (2015). Spent Fuel Modeling and Simulation Using ORIGAMI for Advanced NDA Instrument Testing. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information).
12.
Worrall, Andrew, et al.. (2015). Transition Analysis of Promising U.S. Future Fuel Cycles Using ORION. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information). 5 indexed citations
13.
Brown, Nicholas R., Jeffrey J. Powers, Bo Feng, et al.. (2015). Sustainable thorium nuclear fuel cycles: A comparison of intermediate and fast neutron spectrum systems. Nuclear Engineering and Design. 289. 252–265. 27 indexed citations
14.
Powers, Jeffrey J., et al.. (2014). An Inventory Analysis of Thermal-spectrum Thorium-fueled Molten Salt Reactor Concepts: Supporting U.S. Fuel Cycle Assessment. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information). 2 indexed citations
15.
Maldonado, G. Ivan, et al.. (2014). Neutronic Analysis of Candidate Accident-tolerant Cladding Concepts in Light Water Reactors. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information). 4 indexed citations
16.
Worrall, Andrew. (2013). Utilization of Used Nuclear Fuel in a Potential Future US Fuel Cycle Scenario - 13499. 3 indexed citations
17.
Worrall, Andrew, et al.. (2010). Robust PCI Monitoring During PWR Operation at Southern Nuclear. 3 indexed citations
18.
Worrall, Andrew, et al.. (2010). The Potential of Pressurized Water Reactors for Recycle of Americium-Curium - 10376. 1 indexed citations
19.
Worrall, Andrew, et al.. (2007). Scenario Analyses of Future UK Fuel Cycle Options. Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology. 44(3). 249–256. 7 indexed citations
20.
Worrall, Andrew, et al.. (2005). Effect of Highly Enriched/Highly Burnt UO2 Fuels on Fuel Cycle Costs, Radiotoxicity, and Nuclear Design Parameters. Nuclear Technology. 151(2). 126–132. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026