Peter A. van der Helm

50 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Peter A. van der Helm
Comparison fields: 5 of 130
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 1.1k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 309
  • Social Psychology 307
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 307
  • Artificial Intelligence 136
Replace Emanuel Leeuwenberg with:
Emanuel Leeuwenberg Netherlands
Tarow Indow Japan
William R. Uttal United States
Sergei Gepshtein United States
Chaz Firestone United States
David L. Gilden United States
Branka Špehar Australia
Andrew C. Connolly United States
K. Koffka
Sidney R. Lehky United States
Peter A. van der Helm relative to Emanuel Leeuwenberg Netherlands Emanuel Leeuwenberg's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Emanuel Leeuwenberg · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter A. van der Helm

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter A. van der Helm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter A. van der Helm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter A. van der Helm more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter A. van der Helm

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter A. van der Helm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter A. van der Helm. The network helps show where Peter A. van der Helm may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter A. van der Helm

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter A. van der Helm. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter A. van der Helm based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter A. van der Helm. Peter A. van der Helm is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 3
2 4
3 9
4 5
5 301
6 14
7 21
8 25
9 39
10
Dynamics of Gestalt psychology (invited review of Perceptual Dynamics: Theoretical foundations and philosophical implications of Gestalt psychology by F. Sundqvist)
4
11 7
12 24
13 23
14 30
15 65
16 38
17 7
18 56
19 3
20 46

About Peter A. van der Helm

Peter A. van der Helm is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, General Psychology and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, having authored 50 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (32 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (16 papers) and Face Recognition and Perception (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (1.1k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (309 citations) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (307 citations). Peter A. van der Helm has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Belgium and United States. Frequent co-authors include Emanuel Leeuwenberg, E. L. J. Leeuwenberg, Johan Wagemans, James R. Pomerantz, Jacob Feldman, Sergei Gepshtein, Cees van Leeuwen, Ruth Kimchi, Matthias S. Treder and Rob van Lier. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Psychological Bulletin and Psychological Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026