Douglas Yates
Impact in
- Public Administration top 5%
- Public Policy and Administration Research
- Urban Studies top 5%
- Urban Planning and Governance
Papers in
-
- Natural Resources and Economic Development 5
Douglas Yates
19 papers receiving 212 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
- Public Administration 55
- Urban Studies 35
- Political Science and International Relations 97
- Development 13
- Sociology and Political Science 81
Countries citing papers authored by Douglas Yates
This map shows the geographic impact of Douglas Yates's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Douglas Yates with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Douglas Yates more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Douglas Yates
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Douglas Yates. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Douglas Yates. The network helps show where Douglas Yates may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 5 scholars most cited alongside Douglas Yates, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2022 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 6 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 1 | |
| 4 | Enhancing the Governance of Africa’s Oil Sector | 2009 | 1 |
| 5 | 2006 | 17 | |
| 6 | 2000 | 1 | |
| 7 | Central Africa: oil and the Franco-American rivalry | 1998 | 2 |
| 8 | The rentier state in Gabon | 1994 | 3 |
| 9 | 1987 | 3 | |
| 10 | The politics of management | 1985 | 32 |
| 11 | 1983 | 1 | |
| 12 | 1983 | 21 | |
| 13 | 1982 | 9 | |
| 14 | 1982 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1979 | 78 | |
| 16 | 1979 | 22 | |
| 17 | 1977 | 1 | |
| 18 | Political Innovation and Institution-Building: The Experience of Decentralization Experiments. | 1977 | 4 |
| 19 | Street-Level Governments | 1974 | 14 |
| 20 | 1972 | 40 |
About Douglas Yates
Douglas Yates is a scholar working on General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Development, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Political Science and International Relations and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 24 papers that have together received 264 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Natural Resources and Economic Development (5 papers), Global Energy and Sustainability Research (2 papers), Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research (1 paper), Korean Peninsula Historical and Political Studies (1 paper), Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues (1 paper), African Studies and Ethnography (1 paper), Economic Growth and Development (1 paper) and Philosophy, Sociology, Political Theory (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (55 citations), Urban Studies (35 citations), Political Science and International Relations (97 citations), Development (13 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (81 citations). Douglas Yates has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Iran. Frequent co-authors include Barry Bozeman, Robert K. Yin, Richard L. Nelson, Paul Sabatier and John A. Pearce. Their work appears in journals such as Cahiers d études africaines, American Political Science Review, Policy Sciences, Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews and Political Science Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.