Douglas Williams
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 2%
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition top 5%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 10%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Epidemiology
- Co-authors
- Robert SekulerGregory C. PhillipsScott WatamaniukHoracio KidoHugh R. WilsonBéla JuleszRandolph BlakeLynn D. Zimba
- Topics
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms (12 papers)Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (5 papers)Advanced Optical Imaging Technologies (4 papers)
- Cited by
- Cognitive NeuroscienceCellular and Molecular NeuroscienceComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Partner nations
- United StatesIndiaCanada
In The Last Decade
Douglas Williams
21 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
- Cognitive Neuroscience 1.0k
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 247
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 241
- Social Psychology 113
- Epidemiology 113
Countries citing papers authored by Douglas Williams
This map shows the geographic impact of Douglas Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Douglas Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Douglas Williams more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Douglas Williams
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Douglas Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Douglas Williams. The network helps show where Douglas Williams may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Douglas Williams
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Douglas Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Douglas Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Douglas Williams. Douglas Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 19 | |
| 8 | 42 | |
| 9 | 193 | |
| 10 | 39 | |
| 11 | 13 | |
| 12 | 192 | |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | 123 | |
| 15 | 29 | |
| 16 | 62 | |
| 17 | 366 | |
| 18 | 14 | |
| 19 | 29 | |
| 20 | 0 |
About Douglas Williams
Douglas Williams is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Media Technology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 23 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (12 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (5 papers) and Advanced Optical Imaging Technologies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (1.0k citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (241 citations) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (247 citations). Douglas Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United States, India and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Robert Sekuler, Gregory C. Phillips, Scott Watamaniuk, Horacio Kido, Hugh R. Wilson, Béla Julesz, Randolph Blake, Lynn D. Zimba, Jack D. Cowan and Roger W. Remington. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Vision Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.