Douglas Sloan
- Education top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- History top 5%
- Literature and Literary Theory
- Co-authors
- Neal C. GillespieD. G. HartAndrew HookJames AxtellHelen Lefkowitz HorowitzDaniel Walker HoweStephen Nissenbaum
- Topics
- American Constitutional Law and Politics (7 papers)Religious Education and Schools (2 papers)Historical Education Studies Worldwide (2 papers)
- Cited by
- HistoryGeneral PsychologyEducation
- Journals
- The American Historical ReviewSociologyTeachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Douglas Sloan
24 papers receiving 160 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- Education 92
- Sociology and Political Science 61
- Political Science and International Relations 49
- History 43
- Literature and Literary Theory 22
Countries citing papers authored by Douglas Sloan
This map shows the geographic impact of Douglas Sloan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Douglas Sloan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Douglas Sloan more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Douglas Sloan
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Douglas Sloan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Douglas Sloan. The network helps show where Douglas Sloan may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Douglas Sloan
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Douglas Sloan. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Douglas Sloan based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Douglas Sloan. Douglas Sloan is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 27 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | The computer in education : a critical perspective | 41 |
| 4 | On Raising Critical Questions about the Computer in Education. | 11 |
| 5 | Toward the recovery of wholeness : knowledge, education, and human values | 4 |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | Insight-Imagination: The Emancipation of Thought and the Modern World | 18 |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | Toward an Education for a Living World. | 3 |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 10 | |
| 12 | Education and Values | 5 |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 30 | |
| 18 | 9 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About Douglas Sloan
Douglas Sloan is a scholar working on Aging, Political Science and International Relations and History, having authored 29 papers that have together received 247 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American Constitutional Law and Politics (7 papers), Religious Education and Schools (2 papers) and Historical Education Studies Worldwide (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History (43 citations), General Psychology (5 citations) and Education (92 citations). Douglas Sloan has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Neal C. Gillespie, D. G. Hart, Andrew Hook, James Axtell, Helen Lefkowitz Horowitz, Daniel Walker Howe and Stephen Nissenbaum. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Sociology and Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.