Douglas M. Peers
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Anthropology top 5%
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Global and Planetary Change
- Geography, Planning and Development top 5%
- Topics
- Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East (7 papers)Colonialism, slavery, and trade (5 papers)Military History and Strategy (4 papers)
- Journals
- The Journal of Interdisciplinary HistoryThe Economic History ReviewThe Journal of Asian Studies
- Partner nations
- Canada
In The Last Decade
Douglas M. Peers
22 papers receiving 367 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
- Sociology and Political Science 187
- Anthropology 126
- Political Science and International Relations 91
- Global and Planetary Change 63
- Geography, Planning and Development 55
Countries citing papers authored by Douglas M. Peers
This map shows the geographic impact of Douglas M. Peers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Douglas M. Peers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Douglas M. Peers more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Douglas M. Peers
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Douglas M. Peers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Douglas M. Peers. The network helps show where Douglas M. Peers may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Douglas M. Peers
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Douglas M. Peers. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Douglas M. Peers based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Douglas M. Peers. Douglas M. Peers is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 14 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | Utilitarianism and Empire (review) | 0 |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | Negotiating India in the Nineteenth-Century Media | 17 |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 17 | |
| 10 | 10 | |
| 11 | 0 | |
| 12 | 7 | |
| 13 | 298 | |
| 14 | 11 | |
| 15 | 18 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | 16 | |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Douglas M. Peers
Douglas M. Peers is a scholar working on Anthropology, Political Science and International Relations and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 25 papers that have together received 463 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East (7 papers), Colonialism, slavery, and trade (5 papers) and Military History and Strategy (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (126 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (55 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (29 citations). Douglas M. Peers has collaborated with scholars based in Canada. Frequent co-authors include Richard Grove, David Finkelstein, Lynn Zastoupil and Jeremy Black. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Interdisciplinary History, The Economic History Review and The Journal of Asian Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.