Douglas Howland
- Cultural Studies top 5%
- Japanese History and Culture 9
-
- International Law and Human Rights 7
- China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance 3
- History top 5%
- Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics 2
-
- Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis 2
-
- Chinese history and philosophy 10
- Vietnamese History and Culture Studies 2
-
- International Maritime Law Issues 2
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología (1 paper)The American Historical Review (1 paper)Pacific Affairs (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Douglas Howland
29 papers receiving 151 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
- Cultural Studies 57
- Political Science and International Relations 71
- History 28
- History and Philosophy of Science 11
- Anthropology 22
Countries citing papers authored by Douglas Howland
This map shows the geographic impact of Douglas Howland's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Douglas Howland with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Douglas Howland more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Douglas Howland
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Douglas Howland. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Douglas Howland. The network helps show where Douglas Howland may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 5 scholars most cited alongside Douglas Howland, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 4 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 0 | |
| 7 | International law and Japanese sovereignty the emerging global order in the 19th century | 2016 | 1 |
| 8 | 2016 | 2 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 12 | |
| 10 | 2011 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2010 | 1 | |
| 12 | The State of Sovereignty: Territories, Laws, Populations | 2009 | 24 |
| 13 | 2009 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2005 | 4 | |
| 15 | 2005 | 4 | |
| 16 | 2003 | 18 | |
| 17 | 2002 | 42 | |
| 18 | 2001 | 3 | |
| 19 | 1996 | 17 | |
| 20 | Managed competition: CBO (Congressional Budget Office) is wary. | 1993 | 1 |
About Douglas Howland
Douglas Howland is a scholar working on Cultural Studies, Political Science and International Relations and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 34 papers that have together received 195 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chinese history and philosophy (10 papers), Japanese History and Culture (9 papers), International Law and Human Rights (7 papers), China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (3 papers), International Maritime Law Issues (2 papers), Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics (2 papers), Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (2 papers) and Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cultural Studies (57 citations), Political Science and International Relations (71 citations) and History (28 citations). Douglas Howland has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Luise White, Sally O. Hastings, Barbara Brooks, Susan L. Burns and H. Fueß. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, The American Historical Review and Pacific Affairs.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.