Douglas Fore
- Economics and Econometrics
- Sociology and Political Science
- Accounting
- General Health Professions
- Demography
- Co-authors
- Michael FörsterHoward OxleyThai-Thanh DangJean-Marc BurniauxMarco Mira d’ErcoleP. Brett Hammond
- Topics
- Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis (5 papers)Retirement, Disability, and Employment (4 papers)Income, Poverty, and Inequality (1 paper)
- Cited by
- AccountingDemographySafety Research
- Journals
- PubMedSSRN Electronic JournalScholarly Commons (University of Pennsylvania)
- Partner nations
- FranceUnited States
In The Last Decade
Douglas Fore
5 papers receiving 52 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 28
- Economics and Econometrics 33
- Sociology and Political Science 29
- Accounting 21
- General Health Professions 19
- Demography 15
Countries citing papers authored by Douglas Fore
This map shows the geographic impact of Douglas Fore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Douglas Fore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Douglas Fore more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Douglas Fore
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Douglas Fore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Douglas Fore. The network helps show where Douglas Fore may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Douglas Fore
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Douglas Fore. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Douglas Fore based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Douglas Fore. Douglas Fore is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | Restructuring the Defined Benefit Pension | 1 |
| 3 | Changes in Accounting Practices Will Drive Pension Paradigm Shifts | 7 |
| 4 | A new way of looking at the risk in defined benefit pension plans. | 1 |
| 5 | 25 | |
| 6 | Going Private in the Public Sector: The Transition from Defined Benefit to Defined Contribution Pension Plans | 9 |
| 7 | INCOME DISTRIBUTION AND POVERTY IN SELECTED OECD COUNTRIES : ECONOMICS DEPARTMENT WORKING PAPERS No. 189 | 33 |
About Douglas Fore
Douglas Fore is a scholar working on Accounting, Demography and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 7 papers that have together received 76 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis (5 papers), Retirement, Disability, and Employment (4 papers) and Income, Poverty, and Inequality (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Accounting (21 citations), Demography (15 citations) and Safety Research (10 citations). Douglas Fore has collaborated with scholars based in France and United States. Frequent co-authors include Michael Förster, Howard Oxley, Thai-Thanh Dang, Jean-Marc Burniaux, Marco Mira d’Ercole and P. Brett Hammond. Their work appears in journals such as PubMed, SSRN Electronic Journal and Scholarly Commons (University of Pennsylvania).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.