Dora Games
- Neurology top 0.2%
- Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms 16
- Physiology top 0.2%
- Alzheimer's disease research and treatments 49
- Biological Psychiatry top 1%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 0.5%
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research 14
- Nuclear Receptors and Signaling 7
- Developmental Neuroscience top 1%
-
- Prion Diseases and Protein Misfolding 11
-
- Computational Drug Discovery Methods 11
-
- Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases 9
-
- Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research 7
- Co-authors
- Dale SchenkPeter SeubertEliezer MasliahBradley T. HymanMargaret MalloryKaren KhanLisa McConlogueRobin Barbour
- Journals
- Journal of Neuroscience (9 papers)American Journal Of Pathology (4 papers)Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomJapan
In The Last Decade
Dora Games
55 papers receiving 6.8k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
- Neurology 1.9k
- Physiology 5.4k
- Biological Psychiatry 347
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 2.2k
- Developmental Neuroscience 435
Countries citing papers authored by Dora Games
This map shows the geographic impact of Dora Games's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dora Games with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dora Games more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dora Games
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dora Games. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dora Games. The network helps show where Dora Games may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dora Games, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2014 | 244 | |
| 2 | 2010 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2008 | 55 | |
| 4 | 2007 | 41 | |
| 5 | 2007 | 231 | |
| 6 | 2005 | 43 | |
| 7 | 2005 | 423 | |
| 8 | 2005 | 135 | |
| 9 | 2004 | 130 | |
| 10 | 2002 | 85 | |
| 11 | 2001 | 41 | |
| 12 | 2001 | 31 | |
| 13 | 2001 | 54 | |
| 14 | 2001 | 99 | |
| 15 | 2001 | 23 | |
| 16 | 2000 | 69 | |
| 17 | 2000 | 52 | |
| 18 | 2000 | 57 | |
| 19 | 1999 | 86 | |
| 20 | 1992 | 112 |
About Dora Games
Dora Games is a scholar working on Neurology, Physiology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 55 papers that have together received 7.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (49 papers), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (16 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (14 papers), Prion Diseases and Protein Misfolding (11 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (11 papers), Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (9 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (7 papers) and Nuclear Receptors and Signaling (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (1.9k citations), Physiology (5.4k citations) and Biological Psychiatry (347 citations). Dora Games has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Dale Schenk, Peter Seubert, Eliezer Masliah, Bradley T. Hyman, Margaret Mallory, Karen Khan, Lisa McConlogue, Robin Barbour, Stephen B. Freedman and Lennart Mucke. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, American Journal Of Pathology, Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Alzheimer s & Dementia.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.