Donna Diers
Impact in
- Research and Theory top 0.5%
- Nursing education and management
- Issues, ethics and legal aspects top 0.5%
Papers in
-
- Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation 10
-
- Medical Coding and Health Information 5
- Co-authors
- Christine DuffieldMichael RocheChristine CatlingChris AisbettSusan MoldeKate AisbettLinda O’Brien‐PallasMadeleine King
- Journals
- Nursing Research (8 papers)JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration (5 papers)Journal of Professional Nursing (4 papers)Medical Care (3 papers)Policy Politics & Nursing Practice (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaNew Zealand
In The Last Decade
Donna Diers
88 papers receiving 1.5k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
- Research and Theory 271
- Issues, ethics and legal aspects 139
- Emergency Medical Services 310
- General Health Professions 925
- Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 176
Countries citing papers authored by Donna Diers
This map shows the geographic impact of Donna Diers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Donna Diers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Donna Diers more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Donna Diers
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Donna Diers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Donna Diers. The network helps show where Donna Diers may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Donna Diers, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2010 | 48 | |
| 2 | 2009 | 341 | |
| 3 | 2008 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2005 | 71 | |
| 5 | 2004 | 3 | |
| 6 | 2001 | 6 | |
| 7 | 2001 | 4 | |
| 8 | 1999 | 7 | |
| 9 | 1998 | 63 | |
| 10 | 1997 | 13 | |
| 11 | 1995 | 22 | |
| 12 | 1993 | 1 | |
| 13 | 1992 | 13 | |
| 14 | Nurses in primary care. The new gatekeepers? | 1983 | 19 |
| 15 | 1983 | 2 | |
| 16 | 1983 | 2 | |
| 17 | Nursing reclaims its role. | 1982 | 9 |
| 18 | 1981 | 12 | |
| 19 | 1980 | 6 | |
| 20 | 1979 | 4 |
About Donna Diers
Donna Diers is a scholar working on Issues, ethics and legal aspects, Health Information Management, Research and Theory, General Health Professions and Emergency Medical Services, having authored 95 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nursing Roles and Practices (11 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (10 papers), Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (10 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (7 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (7 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (6 papers), Medical Coding and Health Information (5 papers) and Health Sciences Research and Education (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (271 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (139 citations), Emergency Medical Services (310 citations), General Health Professions (925 citations) and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (176 citations). Donna Diers has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Christine Duffield, Michael Roche, Christine Catling, Chris Aisbett, Susan Molde, Kate Aisbett, Linda O’Brien‐Pallas, Madeleine King, Claire M. Fagin and Janis Bozzo. Their work appears in journals such as Nursing Research, JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration, Journal of Professional Nursing, Medical Care and Policy Politics & Nursing Practice.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.