Donald R. Deis

1.5k total citations
26 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

Donald R. Deis is a scholar working on Accounting, Strategy and Management and Management Information Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, Donald R. Deis has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Accounting, 6 papers in Strategy and Management and 6 papers in Management Information Systems. Recurrent topics in Donald R. Deis's work include Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (13 papers), Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (5 papers) and Accounting and Organizational Management (5 papers). Donald R. Deis is often cited by papers focused on Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (13 papers), Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (5 papers) and Accounting and Organizational Management (5 papers). Donald R. Deis collaborates with scholars based in United States, Taiwan and France. Donald R. Deis's co-authors include Mary B. Curtis, Jean C. Bedard, J. Gregory Jenkins, Gary Giroux, Jere R. Francis, J. Kenneth Reynolds, Mahmud Hossain, Santanu Mitra, Yan Zhang and Pinghsun Huang and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Banking & Finance, The Accounting Review and Contemporary Accounting Research.

In The Last Decade

Donald R. Deis

23 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Donald R. Deis United States 11 993 389 191 152 101 26 1.2k
Greg Trompeter United States 9 784 0.8× 371 1.0× 169 0.9× 124 0.8× 61 0.6× 16 1.0k
Audrey A. Gramling United States 17 1.1k 1.1× 313 0.8× 310 1.6× 100 0.7× 49 0.5× 41 1.2k
Jaime J. Schmidt United States 18 1.2k 1.2× 394 1.0× 207 1.1× 234 1.5× 47 0.5× 41 1.4k
Karl E. Hackenbrack United States 13 906 0.9× 247 0.6× 191 1.0× 191 1.3× 47 0.5× 17 999
Albert L. Nagy United States 14 1.4k 1.5× 571 1.5× 211 1.1× 205 1.3× 35 0.3× 26 1.6k
Neil Fargher Australia 19 1.5k 1.5× 554 1.4× 151 0.8× 481 3.2× 81 0.8× 68 1.7k
Mark J. Kohlbeck United States 20 1.2k 1.2× 599 1.5× 136 0.7× 306 2.0× 36 0.4× 82 1.4k
A. Rashad Abdel‐Khalik United States 20 951 1.0× 412 1.1× 238 1.2× 214 1.4× 29 0.3× 70 1.2k
Philip Wallage Netherlands 12 441 0.4× 274 0.7× 135 0.7× 46 0.3× 106 1.0× 58 737
Christine I. Wiedman Canada 19 1.1k 1.1× 667 1.7× 86 0.5× 419 2.8× 40 0.4× 44 1.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Donald R. Deis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Donald R. Deis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Donald R. Deis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Donald R. Deis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Donald R. Deis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Donald R. Deis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Donald R. Deis. The network helps show where Donald R. Deis may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Donald R. Deis

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Donald R. Deis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Donald R. Deis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Donald R. Deis. Donald R. Deis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Deis, Donald R., et al.. (2025). Pricing the Audit Risk of Innovation: Intangibles and Patents. International Journal of Financial Studies. 13(1). 42–42.
2.
Deis, Donald R., et al.. (2020). FASB's Not-for-Profit Financial Reporting Project: Analysis of Letters to ASU 2016-14 Exposure Draft. 9(1). 45–75. 1 indexed citations
3.
Deis, Donald R., et al.. (2020). Audit Risk Associated with Long-Lived Tangible Asset Intensity, Age, and Impairment. SSRN Electronic Journal. 4 indexed citations
4.
Wilmot, Chester G., et al.. (2013). Investigation into the Impact of Privatizing Civil Engineering Operations in Louisiana DOTD. 2 indexed citations
5.
Deis, Donald R. & Anna M. Rose. (2011). A Comparative Analysis Of Audit Service Supply Using Desk And Working Paper Reviews. Journal of Business & Economics Research (JBER). 2(1). 1 indexed citations
6.
Deis, Donald R., et al.. (2010). Doing Well by Doing Good: Corporate Social Responsibility and Profitability. S.A.M. advanced management journal. 75(1). 44. 33 indexed citations
7.
Mitra, Santanu, Donald R. Deis, & Mahmud Hossain. (2009). The association between audit fees and reported earnings quality in pre‐ and post‐Sarbanes‐Oxley regimes. Review of Accounting and Finance. 8(3). 232–252. 52 indexed citations
8.
Jenkins, J. Gregory, Donald R. Deis, Jean C. Bedard, & Mary B. Curtis. (2008). Accounting Firm Culture and Governance: A Research Synthesis. Behavioral Research in Accounting. 20(1). 45–74. 108 indexed citations
9.
Huang, Pinghsun, et al.. (2008). Do artificial income smoothing and real income smoothing contribute to firm value equivalently?. Journal of Banking & Finance. 33(2). 224–233. 67 indexed citations
10.
Mitra, Santanu, Mahmud Hossain, & Donald R. Deis. (2007). The empirical relationship between ownership characteristics and audit fees. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting. 28(3). 257–285. 163 indexed citations
11.
Wilmot, Chester G., Donald R. Deis, & Rong Xu. (2004). Assessing outsourcing potential in a state dot. Journal of Public Procurement. 4(1). 22–42. 2 indexed citations
12.
Deis, Donald R., et al.. (2004). A simulation approach to in-house versus contracted out cost comparisons. Journal of Public Procurement. 4(1). 43–66. 2 indexed citations
13.
Wilmot, Chester G., et al.. (1999). In-House Versus Consultant Design Costs in State Departments of Transportation. Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 1654(1). 153–160. 7 indexed citations
14.
Deis, Donald R., et al.. (1998). Are Ethical Responses Linked to Locus of Control?. 2(3). 249–260. 8 indexed citations
15.
Deis, Donald R. & R. Carter Hill. (1998). An Application of the Boostrap Method to the Simultaneous Equations Model of the Demand and Supply of Audit Services*. Contemporary Accounting Research. 15(1). 83–99. 13 indexed citations
16.
Schneider, Helmut, et al.. (1998). Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development In-House Versus Consultant Design Cost Study. 2 indexed citations
17.
Schneider, Helmut, et al.. (1998). Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development in-house versus consultant design cost study : technical assistance report.. 1 indexed citations
18.
Deis, Donald R. & Gary Giroux. (1996). The effect of auditor changes on audit fees, audit hours, and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy. 15(1). 55–76. 173 indexed citations
19.
Deis, Donald R. & Daryl M. Guffey. (1995). Further evidence on the relationship between bankruptcy costs and firm size. 34(1). 69–79. 7 indexed citations
20.
Deis, Donald R., et al.. (1992). Determinants of Audit Quality in the Public Sector.. The Accounting Review. 67(3). 462–479.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026