Donald Earl
Impact in
- Anthropology top 5%
- Classical Antiquity Studies
- Classics top 10%
- Medieval Literature and History
- Byzantine Studies and History
Papers in
- History 4
- Historical and Religious Studies of Rome 4
-
- International Law and Aviation 6
- International Law and Human Rights 4
- Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction 4
- World Trade Organization Law 1
Donald Earl
11 papers receiving 74 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 28
- Anthropology 72
- Classics 25
- Philosophy 27
- History 24
- Archeology 19
Countries citing papers authored by Donald Earl
This map shows the geographic impact of Donald Earl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Donald Earl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Donald Earl more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Donald Earl
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Donald Earl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Donald Earl. The network helps show where Donald Earl may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 5 scholars most cited alongside Donald Earl, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | International Conflict of Laws and the New Conflict of Laws Restatement | 2017 | 0 |
| 2 | International Conflict of Laws and the New Conflicts Restatement | 2017 | 1 |
| 3 | Is an International Arbitral Tribunal the Answer to the Challenges of Litigating Transnational Human Rights Cases in a Post-Kiobel World? | 2015 | 0 |
| 4 | General Jurisdiction and the Transnational Law Market | 2014 | 1 |
| 5 | Does International Investment Law Need Administrative Law | 2013 | 0 |
| 6 | Forum Conveniens: The Search for a Convenient Forum in Transnational Cases | 2012 | 1 |
| 7 | The Alien Tort Statute, Federalism, and the Next Wave of International Law Litigation | 2011 | 0 |
| 8 | Comity as Conflict: Resituating International Comity as Conflict of Laws | 2010 | 4 |
| 9 | Using Comparative Constitutional Law to Resolve Domestic Federal Questions | 2003 | 1 |
| 10 | 1969 | 2 | |
| 11 | 1969 | 1 | |
| 12 | 1968 | 15 | |
| 13 | 1968 | 54 | |
| 14 | 1968 | 10 | |
| 15 | 1965 | 1 | |
| 16 | 1963 | 37 |
About Donald Earl
Donald Earl is a scholar working on History, Political Science and International Relations, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management and Accounting, having authored 16 papers that have together received 128 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include International Law and Aviation (6 papers), International Law and Human Rights (4 papers), Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction (4 papers), Historical and Religious Studies of Rome (4 papers), International Arbitration and Investment Law (4 papers), Corporate Law and Human Rights (3 papers), Medieval Philosophy and Theology (1 paper) and World Trade Organization Law (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (72 citations), Classics (25 citations), Philosophy (27 citations), History (24 citations) and Archeology (19 citations). Donald Earl has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Zeph Stewart, Rachel Smith, S. E. Smethurst, Hubert M. Martin and G. W. Bowersock. Their work appears in journals such as The Classical World, Phoenix, The American Historical Review, The American Journal of Philology and The Journal of Roman Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.