Zeph Stewart
Impact in
- Anthropology top 5%
- Classical Antiquity Studies
- Historical and Literary Studies
- Archeology top 2%
- Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies
- Archaeology and Historical Studies
- Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History
Papers in
-
- Biblical Studies and Interpretation 5
-
- Classical Antiquity Studies 9
- Co-authors
- Keith HopkinsDonald EarlJ. Duncan M. DerrettA. D. NockA. A. LongWalter BurkertAgnes Kirsopp MichelsArthur Darby Nock
- Journals
- The American Historical Review (6 papers)Harvard Studies in Classical Philology (3 papers)The American Journal of Philology (3 papers)The Classical World (1 paper)Religious Studies (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Zeph Stewart
17 papers receiving 185 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
- Anthropology 163
- Archeology 106
- Classics 35
- Religious studies 42
- History 48
Countries citing papers authored by Zeph Stewart
This map shows the geographic impact of Zeph Stewart's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Zeph Stewart with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Zeph Stewart more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Zeph Stewart
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Zeph Stewart. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Zeph Stewart. The network helps show where Zeph Stewart may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 10 scholars most cited alongside Zeph Stewart, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2000 | 0 | |
| 2 | Eunuchs in Ancient Religion | 1986 | 5 |
| 3 | Greek Novels and Egyptian Religion | 1986 | 1 |
| 4 | 1980 | 112 | |
| 5 | 1980 | 1 | |
| 6 | 1977 | 13 | |
| 7 | 1975 | 16 | |
| 8 | 1975 | 1 | |
| 9 | Essays on Religion and the Ancient World | 1973 | 21 |
| 10 | 1972 | 46 | |
| 11 | 1972 | 5 | |
| 12 | 1971 | 2 | |
| 13 | 1968 | 3 | |
| 14 | 1968 | 8 | |
| 15 | 1968 | 54 | |
| 16 | The ancient world : justice, heroism, and responsibility | 1966 | 2 |
| 17 | 1959 | 7 | |
| 18 | 1958 | 5 | |
| 19 | 1958 | 4 | |
| 20 | 1953 | 2 |
About Zeph Stewart
Zeph Stewart is a scholar working on Religious studies, Anthropology, Archeology, Philosophy and Classics, having authored 20 papers that have together received 308 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Antiquity Studies (9 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (6 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (5 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (3 papers), Historical and Architectural Studies (2 papers), Ancient Egypt and Archaeology (1 paper), Historical and Religious Studies of Rome (1 paper) and Cultural Studies and Interdisciplinary Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (163 citations), Archeology (106 citations), Classics (35 citations), Religious studies (42 citations) and History (48 citations). Zeph Stewart has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Keith Hopkins, Donald Earl, J. Duncan M. Derrett, A. D. Nock, A. A. Long, Walter Burkert, Agnes Kirsopp Michels, Arthur Darby Nock, F. E. Peters and Charlotte L. Stough. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology, The American Journal of Philology, The Classical World and Religious Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.