Dominique Campion
- Physiology top 0.5%
- Molecular Biology top 2%
- Genetics top 1%
- Neurology top 0.5%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 1%
- Co-authors
- Thierry FrébourgDidier HannequinAlexis BriceCécile DumanchinAnne Rovelet‐LecruxGrégory RauxSébastien FeuilletteMaría Martínez
- Topics
- Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (71 papers)Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (22 papers)Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (19 papers)
- Cited by
- PhysiologyNeurology
- Partner nations
- FranceUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Dominique Campion
160 papers receiving 6.6k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
- Physiology 3.2k
- Molecular Biology 2.7k
- Genetics 1.4k
- Neurology 1.4k
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 1.2k
Countries citing papers authored by Dominique Campion
This map shows the geographic impact of Dominique Campion's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dominique Campion with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dominique Campion more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dominique Campion
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dominique Campion. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dominique Campion. The network helps show where Dominique Campion may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dominique Campion
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dominique Campion. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dominique Campion based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dominique Campion. Dominique Campion is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 64 | |
| 2 | Démences du sujet jeune : démarche diagnostique | 2 |
| 3 | 14 | |
| 4 | 12 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 27 | |
| 7 | 19 | |
| 8 | 54 | |
| 9 | 18 | |
| 10 | 32 | |
| 11 | 12 | |
| 12 | 17 | |
| 13 | 24 | |
| 14 | 22 | |
| 15 | Formes autosomiques dominantes | 1 |
| 16 | 0 | |
| 17 | 79 | |
| 18 | 36 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | 71 |
About Dominique Campion
Dominique Campion is a scholar working on Physiology, Genetics and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 164 papers that have together received 6.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (71 papers), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (22 papers) and Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (19 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physiology (3.2k citations), Neurology (813 citations) and Neurology (1.4k citations). Dominique Campion has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Thierry Frébourg, Didier Hannequin, Alexis Brice, Cécile Dumanchin, Anne Rovelet‐Lecrux, Grégory Raux, Sébastien Feuillette, María Martínez, Martine Vercelletto and Florence Thibaut. Their work appears in journals such as Cell, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Nature Genetics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.