Domenic C. D’Amore
- Paleontology top 2%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 5%
- Global and Planetary Change top 10%
- Geometry and Topology top 5%
- Ecology
- Co-authors
- Colin R. McHenryKaren MorenoStephen WroeRobert J. BlumenschineStephanie K. DrumhellerPhilip ClausenDavid RhindJ. Sean Doody
- Topics
- Evolution and Paleontology Studies (13 papers)Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology (11 papers)Morphological variations and asymmetry (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Domenic C. D’Amore
17 papers receiving 458 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- Paleontology 362
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 197
- Global and Planetary Change 149
- Geometry and Topology 78
- Ecology 55
Countries citing papers authored by Domenic C. D’Amore
This map shows the geographic impact of Domenic C. D’Amore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Domenic C. D’Amore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Domenic C. D’Amore more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Domenic C. D’Amore
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Domenic C. D’Amore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Domenic C. D’Amore. The network helps show where Domenic C. D’Amore may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Domenic C. D’Amore
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Domenic C. D’Amore. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Domenic C. D’Amore based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Domenic C. D’Amore. Domenic C. D’Amore is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 34 | |
| 6 | 31 | |
| 7 | Increasing dietary breadth through allometry: bite forces in sympatric Australian skinks | 1 |
| 8 | 37 | |
| 9 | 15 | |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | 30 | |
| 12 | 26 | |
| 13 | 28 | |
| 14 | 6 | |
| 15 | 27 | |
| 16 | 99 | |
| 17 | 37 | |
| 18 | 77 |
About Domenic C. D’Amore
Domenic C. D’Amore is a scholar working on Paleontology, Geometry and Topology and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 18 papers that have together received 472 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evolution and Paleontology Studies (13 papers), Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology (11 papers) and Morphological variations and asymmetry (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Paleontology (362 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (197 citations) and Geometry and Topology (78 citations). Domenic C. D’Amore has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Colin R. McHenry, Karen Moreno, Stephen Wroe, Robert J. Blumenschine, Stephanie K. Drumheller, Philip Clausen, David Rhind, J. Sean Doody, Emily J. Rayfield and Simon Clulow. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society and Paleobiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.