Emily J. Rayfield
- Paleontology top 0.05%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 0.5%
- Geometry and Topology top 0.2%
- Ecology top 2%
- Global and Planetary Change top 2%
- Co-authors
- Jen A. BrightStephanie E. PiercePaul M. BarrettStephan LautenschlagerKenneth D. AngielczykPhilip S. L. AndersonJesús Marugán‐LobónPamela G. Gill
- Topics
- Evolution and Paleontology Studies (109 papers)Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology (100 papers)Ichthyology and Marine Biology (48 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesSpain
In The Last Decade
Emily J. Rayfield
164 papers receiving 6.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 167
- Paleontology 4.2k
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 1.7k
- Geometry and Topology 1.2k
- Ecology 769
- Global and Planetary Change 762
Countries citing papers authored by Emily J. Rayfield
This map shows the geographic impact of Emily J. Rayfield's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily J. Rayfield with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily J. Rayfield more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emily J. Rayfield
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily J. Rayfield. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily J. Rayfield. The network helps show where Emily J. Rayfield may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily J. Rayfield
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily J. Rayfield. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily J. Rayfield based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily J. Rayfield. Emily J. Rayfield is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 16 | |
| 7 | 27 | |
| 8 | 19 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | 8 | |
| 12 | 9 | |
| 13 | 62 | |
| 14 | 29 | |
| 15 | 40 | |
| 16 | 121 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | The shapes of bird beaks are highly controlled by nondietary factorsbreakdown → | 176 |
| 19 | 52 | |
| 20 | 22 |
About Emily J. Rayfield
Emily J. Rayfield is a scholar working on Paleontology, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Geometry and Topology, having authored 166 papers that have together received 6.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evolution and Paleontology Studies (109 papers), Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology (100 papers) and Ichthyology and Marine Biology (48 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Paleontology (4.2k citations), Geometry and Topology (1.2k citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (1.7k citations). Emily J. Rayfield has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Jen A. Bright, Stephanie E. Pierce, Paul M. Barrett, Stephan Lautenschlager, Kenneth D. Angielczyk, Philip S. L. Anderson, Jesús Marugán‐Lobón, Pamela G. Gill, Philip C. J. Donoghue and Michael J. Fagan. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and The Lancet.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.