Đỗ Thị Trang
Impact in
- Biotechnology top 10%
- Marine Sponges and Natural Products
- Toxicology top 10%
Papers in
-
- Natural product bioactivities and synthesis 43
- Phytochemical Studies and Bioactivities 12
- Phytochemical compounds biological activities 9
-
- Phytochemistry and Biological Activities 30
- Co-authors
- Phan Văn Kiệm (80 shared papers)Bùi Hữu Tài (77 shared papers)Nguyễn Xuân Nhiệm (54 shared papers)Phạm Hải Yến (54 shared papers)Dương Thị Dung (38 shared papers)Châu Văn Minh (18 shared papers)Đan Thị Thúy Hằng (24 shared papers)Dương Thị Hải Yến (22 shared papers)
- Journals
- Chemistry & Biodiversity (17 papers)Natural Product Communications (15 papers)Phytochemistry Letters (6 papers)Phytochemistry (3 papers)RSC Advances (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- VietnamSouth KoreaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Đỗ Thị Trang
79 papers receiving 393 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Biotechnology 56
- Toxicology 20
- Biochemistry 39
- Pharmacology 40
- Pharmacology 66
Countries citing papers authored by Đỗ Thị Trang
This map shows the geographic impact of Đỗ Thị Trang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Đỗ Thị Trang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Đỗ Thị Trang more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Đỗ Thị Trang
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Đỗ Thị Trang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Đỗ Thị Trang. The network helps show where Đỗ Thị Trang may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Đỗ Thị Trang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 91 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 23 | |
| 2 | 2021 | 20 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 19 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 15 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 14 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 13 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 12 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 12 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 12 | |
| 10 | 2019 | 11 | |
| 11 | 2023 | 10 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 9 | |
| 13 | 2022 | 9 | |
| 14 | 2024 | 8 | |
| 15 | 2023 | 8 | |
| 16 | 2017 | 8 | |
| 17 | 2019 | 8 | |
| 18 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 19 | 2016 | 7 | |
| 20 | 2024 | 6 |
About Đỗ Thị Trang
Đỗ Thị Trang is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Plant Science, Biomaterials, Cancer Research and Biotechnology, having authored 91 papers that have together received 397 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (43 papers), Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (30 papers), Phytochemistry and Bioactive Compounds (19 papers), Marine Sponges and Natural Products (14 papers), Phytochemical Studies and Bioactivities (12 papers), Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae (9 papers), Phytochemical compounds biological activities (9 papers) and Synthesis and Biological Activity (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biotechnology (56 citations), Toxicology (20 citations), Biochemistry (39 citations), Pharmacology (40 citations) and Pharmacology (66 citations). Đỗ Thị Trang has collaborated with scholars based in Vietnam, South Korea and United States. Frequent co-authors include Phan Văn Kiệm, Bùi Hữu Tài, Nguyễn Xuân Nhiệm, Phạm Hải Yến, Dương Thị Dung, Châu Văn Minh, Đan Thị Thúy Hằng, Dương Thị Hải Yến, Nguyễn Thị Cúc and Phan Thị Thanh Hương. Their work appears in journals such as Chemistry & Biodiversity, Natural Product Communications, Phytochemistry Letters, Phytochemistry and RSC Advances.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.