Dirk Nabers
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Development top 5%
- Cultural Studies top 10%
- Communication
- Topics
- International Relations and Foreign Policy (12 papers)Global Peace and Security Dynamics (7 papers)European Union Policy and Governance (6 papers)
- Journals
- Review of International StudiesInternational Studies ReviewInternational Studies Perspectives
- Partner nations
- GermanyNew ZealandCanada
In The Last Decade
Dirk Nabers
28 papers receiving 209 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
- Political Science and International Relations 174
- Sociology and Political Science 141
- Development 60
- Cultural Studies 14
- Communication 13
Countries citing papers authored by Dirk Nabers
This map shows the geographic impact of Dirk Nabers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dirk Nabers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dirk Nabers more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dirk Nabers
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dirk Nabers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dirk Nabers. The network helps show where Dirk Nabers may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dirk Nabers
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dirk Nabers. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dirk Nabers based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dirk Nabers. Dirk Nabers is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 10 | |
| 4 | 15 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 40 | |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 50 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | Verfassungsrecht und Außenpolitik: Die Ausübung kollektiver Selbstverteidigung in Deutschland und Japan | 1 |
| 15 | 0 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 5 | |
| 18 | 4 | |
| 19 | Multilateralismus in Ostasien-Pazifik : Probleme und Perspektiven im neuen Jahrhundert | 4 |
| 20 | Kollektive Selbstverteidigung in Japans Sicherheitsstrategie | 2 |
About Dirk Nabers
Dirk Nabers is a scholar working on Development, Political Science and International Relations and Public Administration, having authored 36 papers that have together received 268 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include International Relations and Foreign Policy (12 papers), Global Peace and Security Dynamics (7 papers) and European Union Policy and Governance (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Development (60 citations), Political Science and International Relations (174 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (141 citations). Dirk Nabers has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, New Zealand and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Frank A. Stengel, David Shim, Robert G. Patman, Philip Nel and Hanns W. Maull. Their work appears in journals such as Review of International Studies, International Studies Review and International Studies Perspectives.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.