Dionisios Bratis

28 papers receiving 640 citations

Peers

Dionisios Bratis
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Clinical Psychology 190
  • Biological Psychiatry 21
  • General Health Professions 205
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 118
  • Social Psychology 126
Replace G. Moussas with:
G. Moussas Greece
Pascal Janne Belgium
Jonathan Price United Kingdom
Haixin Bo China
Veronica Chan China
Michael Blumenfield United States
C. Virginia O’Hayer United States
Laura Suarez United States
Ramona S. DeJesus United States
D. Patricia Gray United States
Dionisios Bratis relative to G. Moussas Greece G. Moussas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
G. Moussas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dionisios Bratis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dionisios Bratis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dionisios Bratis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dionisios Bratis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dionisios Bratis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dionisios Bratis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dionisios Bratis. The network helps show where Dionisios Bratis may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Dionisios Bratis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dionisios Bratis Line = papers co-authored together Dionisios Bratis links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013126
2 201698
3 200881
4 200978
5 202054
6 201341
7 200930
8 201029
9 201124
10 201124
11 201413
12
[Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: sense of coherence and family support versus anxiety and depression].
201411
13 201311
14 20239
15 20147
16 20156
17 20103
18 20103
19 20132
20 20082

About Dionisios Bratis

Dionisios Bratis is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Physiology, having authored 28 papers that have together received 661 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health, psychology, and well-being (8 papers), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research (8 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (5 papers), Asthma and respiratory diseases (3 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (2 papers), Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects (2 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (2 papers) and Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (190 citations), Biological Psychiatry (21 citations), General Health Professions (205 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (118 citations) and Social Psychology (126 citations). Dionisios Bratis has collaborated with scholars based in Greece and United States. Frequent co-authors include Athanasios Tselebis, G. Moussas, Ιoannis Ilias, Epaminondas Kosmas, Argyro Pachi, Christos Sikaras, Νikolaos Tzanakis, Emmanuel Zoumakis, Nikolaos M. Siafakas and Alexandros N. Vgontzas. Their work appears in journals such as European Psychiatry, Human Resources for Health, BioMed Research International, European Neuropsychopharmacology and Annals of General Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact