Dinçer Göksülük
- Molecular Biology
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Selçuk KorkmazGökmen ZararsızVahap EldemAhmet ÖztürkGözde Ertürk ZararsızTuba Talo YıldırımTolga Fikret TözümMehmet Çolak
- Topics
- Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (6 papers)Gene expression and cancer classification (6 papers)Dental Radiography and Imaging (4 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONEBioMed Research International
- Partner nations
- TürkiyeUnited StatesFinland
In The Last Decade
Dinçer Göksülük
43 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 199
- Molecular Biology 242
- Clinical Psychology 225
- Social Psychology 181
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 120
- Sociology and Political Science 94
Countries citing papers authored by Dinçer Göksülük
This map shows the geographic impact of Dinçer Göksülük's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dinçer Göksülük with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dinçer Göksülük more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dinçer Göksülük
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dinçer Göksülük. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dinçer Göksülük. The network helps show where Dinçer Göksülük may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dinçer Göksülük
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dinçer Göksülük. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dinçer Göksülük based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dinçer Göksülük. Dinçer Göksülük is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | 20 | |
| 12 | 31 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 11 | |
| 15 | 27 | |
| 16 | 17 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 14 | |
| 19 | 33 | |
| 20 | 35 |
About Dinçer Göksülük
Dinçer Göksülük is a scholar working on Oral Surgery, Medical Laboratory Technology and Health Information Management, having authored 46 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (6 papers), Gene expression and cancer classification (6 papers) and Dental Radiography and Imaging (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (73 citations), Oral Surgery (90 citations) and Clinical Psychology (225 citations). Dinçer Göksülük has collaborated with scholars based in Türkiye, United States and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Selçuk Korkmaz, Gökmen Zararsız, Vahap Eldem, Ahmet Öztürk, Gözde Ertürk Zararsız, Tuba Talo Yıldırım, Tolga Fikret Tözüm, Mehmet Çolak, Güliz N. Güncü and Nihal Avcu. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and BioMed Research International.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.