Dina Zekry

82 papers receiving 2.6k citations

Peers

Dina Zekry
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 849
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 679
  • Physiology 1.1k
  • Neurology 318
  • Aging 66
Replace Meltem Halil with:
Meltem Halil Türkiye
Keng Bee Yap Singapore
Ingo Beyer Belgium
Wei‐Ju Lee Taiwan
Giuseppe Zuccalà Italy
Ma Shwe Zin Nyunt Singapore
B. Penninx United States
L. P. Fried United States
Liang Feng Singapore
Alessandro Blè Italy
Dina Zekry relative to Meltem Halil Türkiye Meltem Halil's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.5×
Meltem Halil · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dina Zekry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dina Zekry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dina Zekry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dina Zekry more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dina Zekry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dina Zekry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dina Zekry. The network helps show where Dina Zekry may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dina Zekry, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dina Zekry Line = papers co-authored together Dina Zekry links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 88 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009472
2 2002171
3 2007165
4 2002142
5 200398
6 201498
7 202090
8 201389
9 200886
10 201179
11 200276
12 201157
13 201156
14 201055
15 200353
16 201149
17 200845
18 201643
19 201041
20 200237

About Dina Zekry

Dina Zekry is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, Physiology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Neurology and Neurology, having authored 88 papers that have together received 2.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Frailty in Older Adults (25 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (19 papers), Nutrition and Health in Aging (16 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (9 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (9 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (8 papers), Long-Term Effects of COVID-19 (7 papers) and COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (849 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (679 citations), Physiology (1.1k citations), Neurology (318 citations) and Aging (66 citations). Dina Zekry has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Jean‐Pierre Michel, Garry E. Gold, François R. Herrmann, Pierre Olivier Lang, Jean‐Jacques Hauw, Karl‐Heinz Krause, Christophe Graf, R Moulias, Raphaël Grandjean and Charles Duyckaerts. Their work appears in journals such as Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, Journal of Clinical Medicine, The journal of nutrition health & aging and The Journals of Gerontology Series A.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact