Dina Orozco
- Insect Science top 2%
- Aging top 1%
- Demography top 2%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 5%
- Ecology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Pablo LiedoJames R. CareyJames W. VaupelJosé S. MezaLuis Quintero‐FongEmilio Hernández⋆Marc TatarC. O. Calkins
- Topics
- Insect behavior and control techniques (15 papers)Plant and animal studies (7 papers)Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (5 papers)
- Cited by
- AgingInsect ScienceDemography
- Journals
- ScienceSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaJournal of Animal Ecology
- Partner nations
- MexicoChileCosta Rica
In The Last Decade
Dina Orozco
16 papers receiving 751 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
- Insect Science 408
- Aging 246
- Demography 186
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 173
- Ecology 167
Countries citing papers authored by Dina Orozco
This map shows the geographic impact of Dina Orozco's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dina Orozco with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dina Orozco more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dina Orozco
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dina Orozco. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dina Orozco. The network helps show where Dina Orozco may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dina Orozco
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dina Orozco. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dina Orozco based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dina Orozco. Dina Orozco is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Confucius vs. The Women of China: A Feminist Struggle | 1 |
| 2 | 9 | |
| 3 | 26 | |
| 4 | 42 | |
| 5 | 24 | |
| 6 | 12 | |
| 7 | 55 | |
| 8 | 10 | |
| 9 | 46 | |
| 10 | 24 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | 23 | |
| 13 | Evaluación de sistemas de trampeo y atrayentes para la captura de hembras de Ceratitis capitata (Wied.) y otras moscas de la fruta (Diptera: Tephritidae) en la región del Soconusco, Chiapas | 5 |
| 14 | Development of attractant systems for trapping female Ceratitis capitata (Wied.) (Diptera: Tephritidae) in the Soconusco region, Chiapas, Mexico | 1 |
| 15 | 54 | |
| 16 | 425 | |
| 17 | 49 |
About Dina Orozco
Dina Orozco is a scholar working on Insect Science, Aging and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 17 papers that have together received 813 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect behavior and control techniques (15 papers), Plant and animal studies (7 papers) and Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (246 citations), Insect Science (408 citations) and Demography (186 citations). Dina Orozco has collaborated with scholars based in Mexico, Chile and Costa Rica. Frequent co-authors include Pablo Liedo, James R. Carey, James W. Vaupel, José S. Meza, Luis Quintero‐Fong, Emilio Hernández⋆, Marc Tatar, C. O. Calkins, José Arredondo and Leopoldo Cruz‐López. Their work appears in journals such as Science, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Journal of Animal Ecology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.