Diego Lozano‐Soldevilla
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 10%
- Psychiatry and Mental health
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Neurology
- Co-authors
- Niels ter HuurneOle JensenRufin VanRullenRobert OostenveldRoshan CoolsJoão BarbosaAlbert CompteMark Roberts
- Topics
- Neural dynamics and brain function (15 papers)EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (7 papers)Visual perception and processing mechanisms (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- SpainFranceNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Diego Lozano‐Soldevilla
17 papers receiving 460 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Cognitive Neuroscience 400
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 125
- Psychiatry and Mental health 33
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 29
- Neurology 29
Countries citing papers authored by Diego Lozano‐Soldevilla
This map shows the geographic impact of Diego Lozano‐Soldevilla's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diego Lozano‐Soldevilla with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diego Lozano‐Soldevilla more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Diego Lozano‐Soldevilla
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diego Lozano‐Soldevilla. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diego Lozano‐Soldevilla. The network helps show where Diego Lozano‐Soldevilla may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Diego Lozano‐Soldevilla
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Diego Lozano‐Soldevilla. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Diego Lozano‐Soldevilla based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Diego Lozano‐Soldevilla. Diego Lozano‐Soldevilla is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9 | |
| 2 | 11 | |
| 3 | 22 | |
| 4 | 18 | |
| 5 | 36 | |
| 6 | 11 | |
| 7 | 50 | |
| 8 | 54 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 19 | |
| 11 | 13 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 35 | |
| 14 | 78 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 93 | |
| 17 | 5 |
About Diego Lozano‐Soldevilla
Diego Lozano‐Soldevilla is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, having authored 17 papers that have together received 461 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural dynamics and brain function (15 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (7 papers) and Visual perception and processing mechanisms (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (400 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (125 citations) and Neurology (29 citations). Diego Lozano‐Soldevilla has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, France and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Niels ter Huurne, Ole Jensen, Rufin VanRullen, Robert Oostenveld, Roshan Cools, João Barbosa, Albert Compte, Mark Roberts, Peter De Weerd and Alessandro Benedetto. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Communications, Current Biology and Journal of Neurophysiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.