Didier Lime

23 papers receiving 224 citations

Peers

Didier Lime
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
  • Software 50
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 196
  • Hardware and Architecture 77
  • Management Information Systems 31
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 17
Replace Jasen Markovski with:
Jasen Markovski Netherlands
Louchka Popova-Zeugmann Germany
David K. Probst United States
Madhavan Mukund India
Thomas Hune Denmark
Bas Luttik Netherlands
David de Frutos Escrig Spain
Mandayam Srivas United States
Michael W. Shields United Kingdom
Paritosh K. Pandya India
Didier Lime relative to Jasen Markovski Netherlands Jasen Markovski's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×
Jasen Markovski · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Didier Lime

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Didier Lime's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Didier Lime with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Didier Lime more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Didier Lime

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Didier Lime. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Didier Lime. The network helps show where Didier Lime may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Didier Lime, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Didier Lime Line = papers co-authored together Didier Lime links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200643
2 200637
3 200732
4 200828
5 201420
6 201216
7 200314
8 201412
9 20088
10 20166
11 20183
12 20203
13 20133
14 20063
15 20223
16 20163
17 20132
18 20052
19 20201
20 20121

About Didier Lime

Didier Lime is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Hardware and Architecture, Software, Artificial Intelligence and Management Information Systems, having authored 28 papers that have together received 243 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Formal Methods in Verification (25 papers), Petri Nets in System Modeling (17 papers), Real-Time Systems Scheduling (8 papers), Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques (6 papers), Logic, programming, and type systems (4 papers), Security and Verification in Computing (4 papers), Software Testing and Debugging Techniques (3 papers) and Business Process Modeling and Analysis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Software (50 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (196 citations), Hardware and Architecture (77 citations), Management Information Systems (31 citations) and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (17 citations). Didier Lime has collaborated with scholars based in France, Australia and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Olivier Roux, François Vernadat, Bernard Berthomieu, Franck Cassez, Gilles Bernot, Jamil Ahmad, Jean‐Paul Comet, Serge Haddad, Béatrice Bérard and Étienne André. Their work appears in journals such as Discrete Event Dynamic Systems, Theoretical Computer Science, International Journal of Control, ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology and IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact