Didier Le Gall

424 total citations
16 papers, 304 citations indexed

About

Didier Le Gall is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Cognitive Neuroscience and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Didier Le Gall has authored 16 papers receiving a total of 304 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health, 7 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 6 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Didier Le Gall's work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (6 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (5 papers) and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (4 papers). Didier Le Gall is often cited by papers focused on Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (6 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (5 papers) and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (4 papers). Didier Le Gall collaborates with scholars based in France, Tunisia and Canada. Didier Le Gall's co-authors include Stéphane Richard‐Devantoy, Frédérique Etcharry‐Bouyx, Philippe Allain, Jérémy Besnard, Fabrice Jollant, Pierre Nolin, Takehiko Yamaguchi, Paul Richard, Zied Kefi and Cédric Annweiler and has published in prestigious journals such as Neuropsychologia, Journal of Affective Disorders and Psychiatry Research.

In The Last Decade

Didier Le Gall

15 papers receiving 302 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Didier Le Gall France	8	176	98	82	60	41	16	304
Silvia Cavedoni Italy	9	146 0.8×	87 0.9×	41 0.5×	37 0.6×	60 1.5×	12	280
Sarah C. Seligman United States	7	178 1.0×	110 1.1×	63 0.8×	82 1.4×	15 0.4×	9	315
Alessia Gallucci Italy	10	77 0.4×	121 1.2×	70 0.9×	37 0.6×	48 1.2×	24	360
Jean Neils‐Strunjas United States	11	118 0.7×	228 2.3×	58 0.7×	30 0.5×	65 1.6×	36	489
Ji Woon Jeong South Korea	10	177 1.0×	156 1.6×	39 0.5×	106 1.8×	17 0.4×	18	402
Molly Maloney United States	9	126 0.7×	47 0.5×	58 0.7×	27 0.5×	60 1.5×	16	308
Peyman Hassani‐Abharian Iran	11	100 0.6×	112 1.1×	83 1.0×	51 0.8×	34 0.8×	52	362
Toshikazu Kawagoe Japan	12	136 0.8×	265 2.7×	21 0.3×	85 1.4×	48 1.2×	30	486
Claire‐Marie Giabbiconi Germany	9	56 0.3×	169 1.7×	103 1.3×	55 0.9×	107 2.6×	11	424
M. Meredith Gillis United States	7	82 0.5×	197 2.0×	42 0.5×	83 1.4×	10 0.2×	8	319

Countries citing papers authored by Didier Le Gall

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Didier Le Gall's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Didier Le Gall with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Didier Le Gall more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Didier Le Gall

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Didier Le Gall. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Didier Le Gall. The network helps show where Didier Le Gall may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Didier Le Gall

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Didier Le Gall. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Didier Le Gall based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Didier Le Gall. Didier Le Gall is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

16 of 16 papers shown

1.

Gall, Didier Le, et al.. (2025). Role of cognitive estimation in decision making: evidence from patients with prefrontal cortex damage. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology. 47(4). 287–302.

2.

Gall, Didier Le, et al.. (2024). Relationship Between Cognitive Estimation, Executive Functions, and Theory of Mind in Patients With Prefrontal Cortex Damage. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology. 40(4). 744–766. 1 indexed citations

3.

Jarry, Christophe, François Osiurak, Josselin Baumard, et al.. (2020). Daily life activities in patients with Alzheimer’s disease or semantic dementia: Multitasking assessment. Neuropsychologia. 150. 107714–107714. 8 indexed citations

4.

Gall, Didier Le, et al.. (2019). Neuro-cognitive correlates of alexithymia in patients with circumscribed prefrontal cortex damage. Neuropsychologia. 135. 107228–107228. 5 indexed citations

5.

Marzouki, Yousri, et al.. (2019). The Adaptation and Validation of an Arabic Version of the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia (A-CSDD). Journal of Alzheimer s Disease. 67(3). 839–848. 5 indexed citations

6.

Bellaj, Tarek, et al.. (2017). The Development of the Dementia Screening Battery-100: Instrument Presentation, Reliability, and Construct Validity. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra. 7(2). 215–229. 5 indexed citations

7.

Gall, Didier Le, et al.. (2017). An Arabic Version of the Cognitive Subscale of the Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS-Cog): Reliability, Validity, and Normative Data. Journal of Alzheimer s Disease. 60(1). 11–21. 23 indexed citations

8.

Besnard, Jérémy, Didier Le Gall, Valérie Chauviré, et al.. (2016). Discrepancy between social and nonsocial decision-making under uncertainty following prefrontal lobe damage: the impact of an interactionist approach. Social Neuroscience. 12(4). 430–447. 11 indexed citations

9.

Gorwood, Philip, et al.. (2015). Cognitive control and schizophrenia: The greatest reliability of the Stroop task. Psychiatry Research. 227(1). 10–16. 24 indexed citations

10.

Allain, Philippe, Jérémy Besnard, Takehiko Yamaguchi, et al.. (2014). Detecting Everyday Action Deficits in Alzheimer’s Disease Using a Nonimmersive Virtual Reality Kitchen. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society. 20(5). 468–477. 96 indexed citations

11.

Gall, Didier Le, et al.. (2012). Cognitive inhibition and quality of life in schizophrenia: A pilot study. Schizophrenia Research. 143(2-3). 297–300. 7 indexed citations

12.

Richard‐Devantoy, Stéphane, Fabrice Jollant, Zied Kefi, et al.. (2012). Deficit of cognitive inhibition in depressed elderly: A neurocognitive marker of suicidal risk. Journal of Affective Disorders. 140(2). 193–199. 91 indexed citations

13.

Roy, Arnaud, et al.. (2011). Étude d'un cas de syndrome dysexécutif à prédominance cognitive chez un enfant présentant une épilepsie frontale symptomatique. Revue de neuropsychologie. Volume 3(1). 11–22. 4 indexed citations

14.

Roy, Arnaud, et al.. (2011). Étude d'un cas de syndrome dysexécutif à prédominance cognitive chez un enfant présentant une épilepsie frontale symptomatique. Revue de neuropsychologie. 3(1). 11–11. 4 indexed citations

15.

Allain, Philippe, Clive W. J. Granger, Cédric Annweiler, et al.. (2009). P3-21 Fonctions exécutives et maladie d’Alzheimer : Intérêt du «Tinker Toy Test» pour prédire l’autonomie. Revue Neurologique. 165(10). 77–77. 1 indexed citations

16.

Allain, Philippe, Hervé Chaudet, Frédérique Etcharry‐Bouyx, et al.. (2007). Étude de la planification de l’action au moyen du test du plan du zoo dans la maladie d’Alzheimer. Revue Neurologique. 163(2). 222–230. 19 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact