Dianne Angelo

421 total citations
10 papers, 320 citations indexed

About

Dianne Angelo is a scholar working on Occupational Therapy, Clinical Psychology and Developmental and Educational Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Dianne Angelo has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 320 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Occupational Therapy, 5 papers in Clinical Psychology and 4 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology. Recurrent topics in Dianne Angelo's work include Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility (7 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (5 papers) and Language Development and Disorders (3 papers). Dianne Angelo is often cited by papers focused on Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility (7 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (5 papers) and Language Development and Disorders (3 papers). Dianne Angelo collaborates with scholars based in United States. Dianne Angelo's co-authors include Stephen Kokoska, Howard P. Parette, Howard Goldstein, Mary Beth O’Connell, Anna Hume, Mélissa Roy, Jonathan N. Perkins, Douglas F. Covey, Judith Jacobi and John W. Beardsley and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Media Literacy Education, Research in Developmental Disabilities and The Journal of Special Education.

In The Last Decade

Dianne Angelo

10 papers receiving 288 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Dianne Angelo United States 8 258 198 108 101 70 10 320
Christine Holyfield United States 14 427 1.7× 124 0.6× 120 1.1× 326 3.2× 129 1.8× 41 477
Yvonne Swinth United States 8 111 0.4× 76 0.4× 86 0.8× 41 0.4× 15 0.2× 23 284
Shaunita Strozier United States 6 115 0.4× 54 0.3× 143 1.3× 171 1.7× 20 0.3× 6 300
Catherine Olsson United States 6 135 0.5× 130 0.7× 37 0.3× 28 0.3× 16 0.2× 9 277
Frank M. Cirrin United States 7 79 0.3× 133 0.7× 299 2.8× 122 1.2× 2 0.0× 8 366
Ann M. Marshall United States 6 48 0.2× 105 0.5× 275 2.5× 199 2.0× 3 0.0× 7 310
Emily Sartini United States 8 39 0.2× 74 0.4× 139 1.3× 143 1.4× 2 0.0× 12 261
Emma Mckenzie United Kingdom 5 94 0.4× 41 0.2× 67 0.6× 96 1.0× 9 0.1× 8 133
Sima Gerber United States 4 54 0.2× 52 0.3× 100 0.9× 76 0.8× 15 0.2× 7 146
Frances L. Kohl United States 10 32 0.1× 89 0.4× 133 1.2× 73 0.7× 14 205

Countries citing papers authored by Dianne Angelo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dianne Angelo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dianne Angelo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dianne Angelo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dianne Angelo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dianne Angelo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dianne Angelo. The network helps show where Dianne Angelo may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dianne Angelo

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dianne Angelo. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dianne Angelo based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dianne Angelo. Dianne Angelo is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Angelo, Dianne. (2000). Impact of augmentative and alternative communication devices on families. Augmentative and Alternative Communication. 16(1). 37–47. 71 indexed citations
2.
3.
Angelo, Dianne, et al.. (1996). Family perspective on augmentative and alternative communication: families of adolescents and young adults. Augmentative and Alternative Communication. 12(1). 13–22. 34 indexed citations
4.
Parette, Howard P. & Dianne Angelo. (1996). Augmentative and Alternative Communication Impact on Families: Trends and Future Directions. The Journal of Special Education. 30(1). 77–98. 55 indexed citations
5.
Beardsley, John W., Douglas F. Covey, Anna Hume, et al.. (1995). Rewards and advancements for clinical pharmacy practitioners. Journal of Media Literacy Education. 2 indexed citations
6.
Angelo, Dianne, et al.. (1995). Family perspective on augmentative and alternative communication: Families of young children. Augmentative and Alternative Communication. 11(3). 193–202. 73 indexed citations
7.
Angelo, Dianne. (1991). Enhancing Nonsymbolic Communication Interactions Among Learners with Severe Disabilities,. Journal of Early Intervention. 15(2). 209–212. 1 indexed citations
8.
Angelo, Dianne & Howard Goldstein. (1990). Effects of a Pragmatic Teaching Strategy for Requesting Information by Communication Board Users. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders. 55(2). 231–243. 23 indexed citations
9.
Goldstein, Howard, et al.. (1987). Effects of Training Method and Word Order on Adults’ Acquisition of Miniature Linguistic Systems. The Psychological Record. 37(1). 89–107. 7 indexed citations
10.
Goldstein, Howard, et al.. (1987). Acquisition and extension of syntactic repertoires by severely mentally retarded youth. Research in Developmental Disabilities. 8(4). 549–574. 33 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026