Diane Whitaker-Worth
- Dermatology top 0.5%
- Immunology and Allergy top 2%
- Oncology
- Epidemiology
- Physiology
- Co-authors
- Jane M. Grant‐KelsWendy S. SusserMark BoguniewiczMary M. PrendergastK. TongWilliam AbramovitsMark LebwohlJustin Finch
- Topics
- Dermatology and Skin Diseases (10 papers)Autoimmune Bullous Skin Diseases (7 papers)Asthma and respiratory diseases (6 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaJournal of the American Academy of DermatologyPharmacoEconomics
- Partner nations
- United StatesChinaPuerto Rico
In The Last Decade
Diane Whitaker-Worth
27 papers receiving 706 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
- Dermatology 566
- Immunology and Allergy 226
- Oncology 180
- Epidemiology 156
- Physiology 86
Countries citing papers authored by Diane Whitaker-Worth
This map shows the geographic impact of Diane Whitaker-Worth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diane Whitaker-Worth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diane Whitaker-Worth more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Diane Whitaker-Worth
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diane Whitaker-Worth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diane Whitaker-Worth. The network helps show where Diane Whitaker-Worth may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Diane Whitaker-Worth
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Diane Whitaker-Worth. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Diane Whitaker-Worth based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Diane Whitaker-Worth. Diane Whitaker-Worth is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 32 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 25 | |
| 9 | 14 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 19 | |
| 12 | 8 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 28 | |
| 15 | 35 | |
| 16 | 7 | |
| 17 | Melanoma screening behavior among primary care physicians. | 12 |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | 49 | |
| 20 | 60 |
About Diane Whitaker-Worth
Diane Whitaker-Worth is a scholar working on Dermatology, Immunology and Allergy and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 29 papers that have together received 752 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dermatology and Skin Diseases (10 papers), Autoimmune Bullous Skin Diseases (7 papers) and Asthma and respiratory diseases (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Dermatology (566 citations), Immunology and Allergy (226 citations) and Oncology (180 citations). Diane Whitaker-Worth has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Puerto Rico. Frequent co-authors include Jane M. Grant‐Kels, Wendy S. Susser, Mark Boguniewicz, Mary M. Prendergast, K. Tong, William Abramovits, Mark Lebwohl, Justin Finch, Charles N. Ellis and Lynn A. Drake. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology and PharmacoEconomics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.