Raym Crow
- Information Systems top 2%
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty top 2%
- Information Systems and Management top 5%
- Computer Science Applications top 5%
- Conservation top 2%
- Topics
- Publishing and Scholarly Communication (4 papers)Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (3 papers)Research Data Management Practices (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
Raym Crow
12 papers receiving 405 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
- Information Systems 312
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 155
- Information Systems and Management 109
- Computer Science Applications 86
- Conservation 58
Countries citing papers authored by Raym Crow
This map shows the geographic impact of Raym Crow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Raym Crow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Raym Crow more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Raym Crow
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Raym Crow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Raym Crow. The network helps show where Raym Crow may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Raym Crow
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Raym Crow. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Raym Crow based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Raym Crow. Raym Crow is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 17 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | Institutional and Organizational Liability for Hazing in Intercollegiate and Professional Team Sports | 9 |
| 4 | Library Publishing Services: Strategies for Success: Final Research Report (March 2012) | 5 |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 45 | |
| 7 | Campus-based publishing partnerships: A guide to critical issues | 14 |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 24 | |
| 10 | Publishing cooperatives: an alternative for society publishers | 4 |
| 11 | Half full: the improving state of scholarly publishing | 1 |
| 12 | [Institutional repository software options: questions and answers with the experts with representatives from ARNO, CDSware, DSpace, Fedora, GNU Eprints, i-Tor, MPG eDoc and MyCoRe] | 1 |
| 13 | The Case for Institutional Repositories: A SPARC Position Paper | 403 |
| 14 | Profiles of Sport Industry Professionals: The People Who Make the Games Happen | 3 |
About Raym Crow
Raym Crow is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Information Systems and Computer Science Applications, having authored 14 papers that have together received 535 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Publishing and Scholarly Communication (4 papers), Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (3 papers) and Research Data Management Practices (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (155 citations), Conservation (58 citations) and Computer Science Applications (86 citations). Raym Crow has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Eric MacIntosh, Richard B. Gallagher, Mary A. Hums, Matthew J. Robinson and Barbara Kline Pope. Their work appears in journals such as First Monday, European Sport Management Quarterly and Learned Publishing.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.