Diane E. Spicer

3.3k citations
117 papers · 1.5k · h-index 24

Impact in

Papers in

Diane E. Spicer

106 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Diane E. Spicer
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 766
  • Epidemiology 850
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 684
  • Surgery 519
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 156
Replace R H Anderson with:
R H Anderson United Kingdom
M Rijlaarsdam Netherlands
Stella Van Praagh United States
Joey English United States
Kenneth L. Jue United States
María V. de la Cruz Mexico
Lynn M. Kutsche United States
Curtis A. Given United States
Amandeep Kumar India
H. Zwenneke Flach Netherlands
Diane E. Spicer relative to R H Anderson United Kingdom R H Anderson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.7×
R H Anderson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Diane E. Spicer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Diane E. Spicer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diane E. Spicer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diane E. Spicer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Diane E. Spicer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diane E. Spicer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diane E. Spicer. The network helps show where Diane E. Spicer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Diane E. Spicer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Diane E. Spicer Line = papers co-authored together Diane E. Spicer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 117 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201456
2 201455
3 201950
4 201449
5 201749
6 201046
7 201644
8 201542
9 201638
10 201537
11 201735
12 201534
13 201632
14 201430
15 202130
16 201127
17 201527
18 201427
19 201825
20 201725

About Diane E. Spicer

Diane E. Spicer is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery and Molecular Biology, having authored 117 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Congenital Heart Disease Studies (69 papers), Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (34 papers), Congenital heart defects research (33 papers), Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (25 papers), Coronary Artery Anomalies (23 papers), Vascular anomalies and interventions (16 papers), Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (14 papers) and Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (766 citations), Epidemiology (850 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (684 citations), Surgery (519 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (156 citations). Diane E. Spicer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Robert H. Anderson, Shumpei Mori, Justin T. Tretter, Timothy J. Mohun, Nigel A. Brown, Carl L. Backer, Anthony M. Hlavacek, Rohit S. Loomba, Damián Sánchez‐Quintana and Marios Loukas. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease, Clinical Anatomy, Arrhythmia & Electrophysiology Review, Heart Rhythm and Heart.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact