Diana K. Hews
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 0.5%
- Global and Planetary Change top 1%
- Ecology top 5%
- Genetics top 10%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 5%
- Co-authors
- Michael C. MooreRosemary KnappVanessa S. QuinnMaria ThakerSteven L. LimaWilliam E. WagnerAndrew R. BlausteinErina Hara
- Topics
- Animal Behavior and Reproduction (52 papers)Amphibian and Reptile Biology (38 papers)Plant and animal studies (32 papers)
- Cited by
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and SystematicsGlobal and Planetary ChangeDevelopmental Biology
- Partner nations
- United StatesMexicoJapan
In The Last Decade
Diana K. Hews
57 papers receiving 2.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 1.8k
- Global and Planetary Change 1.2k
- Ecology 338
- Genetics 274
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 258
Countries citing papers authored by Diana K. Hews
This map shows the geographic impact of Diana K. Hews's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diana K. Hews with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diana K. Hews more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Diana K. Hews
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diana K. Hews. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diana K. Hews. The network helps show where Diana K. Hews may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Diana K. Hews
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Diana K. Hews. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Diana K. Hews based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Diana K. Hews. Diana K. Hews is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 8 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 14 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 7 | |
| 9 | 23 | |
| 10 | 16 | |
| 11 | 29 | |
| 12 | 40 | |
| 13 | 53 | |
| 14 | 28 | |
| 15 | 66 | |
| 16 | 39 | |
| 17 | 65 | |
| 18 | 21 | |
| 19 | 76 | |
| 20 | 107 |
About Diana K. Hews
Diana K. Hews is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Global and Planetary Change and Sensory Systems, having authored 58 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal Behavior and Reproduction (52 papers), Amphibian and Reptile Biology (38 papers) and Plant and animal studies (32 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (1.8k citations), Global and Planetary Change (1.2k citations) and Developmental Biology (99 citations). Diana K. Hews has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Mexico and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Michael C. Moore, Rosemary Knapp, Vanessa S. Quinn, Maria Thaker, Steven L. Lima, William E. Wagner, Andrew R. Blaustein, Erina Hara, Michael J. Ryan and Emı́lia P. Martins. Their work appears in journals such as Trends in Ecology & Evolution, Scientific Reports and The American Naturalist.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.