Rosemary Knapp
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 0.5%
- Ecology top 5%
- Global and Planetary Change top 5%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 5%
- Physiology top 1%
- Co-authors
- Michael C. MooreDiana K. HewsAndrew H. BassBryan D. NeffChristopher J. LearyTimothy M. CaseyJohn C. WingfieldPaul M. Forlano
- Topics
- Animal Behavior and Reproduction (42 papers)Reproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species (15 papers)Amphibian and Reptile Biology (13 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaGermany
In The Last Decade
Rosemary Knapp
50 papers receiving 1.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 1.4k
- Ecology 617
- Global and Planetary Change 575
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 318
- Physiology 259
Countries citing papers authored by Rosemary Knapp
This map shows the geographic impact of Rosemary Knapp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rosemary Knapp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rosemary Knapp more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Rosemary Knapp
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rosemary Knapp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rosemary Knapp. The network helps show where Rosemary Knapp may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rosemary Knapp
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rosemary Knapp. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rosemary Knapp based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rosemary Knapp. Rosemary Knapp is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 15 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 20 | |
| 5 | 16 | |
| 6 | 19 | |
| 7 | 23 | |
| 8 | 66 | |
| 9 | Differential Gene Expression in the Retinas of tubby Mice: A cDNA Microarray Analysis | 1 |
| 10 | 40 | |
| 11 | 55 | |
| 12 | 66 | |
| 13 | 39 | |
| 14 | Steroid hormone profiles and relative condition of calling and satellite toads: implications for proximate regulation of behavioral phenotypes. | 2 |
| 15 | 41 | |
| 16 | 15 | |
| 17 | 108 | |
| 18 | 27 | |
| 19 | 4 | |
| 20 | 107 |
About Rosemary Knapp
Rosemary Knapp is a scholar working on Physiology, Developmental Biology and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 50 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal Behavior and Reproduction (42 papers), Reproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species (15 papers) and Amphibian and Reptile Biology (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Biology (233 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (1.4k citations) and Physiology (259 citations). Rosemary Knapp has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Michael C. Moore, Diana K. Hews, Andrew H. Bass, Bryan D. Neff, Christopher J. Leary, Timothy M. Casey, John C. Wingfield, Paul M. Forlano, Joseph A. Sisneros and Timothy Parker. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Ecology and The American Naturalist.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.