Diana Fuss

3.9k total citations · 2 hit papers
41 papers, 1.6k citations indexed

About

Diana Fuss is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Clinical Psychology and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Diana Fuss has authored 41 papers receiving a total of 1.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Literature and Literary Theory, 4 papers in Clinical Psychology and 4 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Diana Fuss's work include Architecture, Design, and Social History (4 papers), Contemporary Literature and Criticism (2 papers) and Poetry Analysis and Criticism (2 papers). Diana Fuss is often cited by papers focused on Architecture, Design, and Social History (4 papers), Contemporary Literature and Criticism (2 papers) and Poetry Analysis and Criticism (2 papers). Diana Fuss collaborates with scholars based in . Diana Fuss's co-authors include Anna Marie Smith and Deborah Cameron and has published in prestigious journals such as Feminist Review, The Modern Language Review and Critical Inquiry.

In The Last Decade

Diana Fuss

28 papers receiving 978 citations

Hit Papers

Essentially Speaking: Feminism, Nature and Difference 1991 2026 2002 2014 1991 1991 100 200 300 400 500

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Diana Fuss 13 747 394 260 212 167 41 1.6k
Robyn Wiegman United States 16 676 0.9× 415 1.1× 209 0.8× 190 0.9× 115 0.7× 49 1.3k
Juliet Mitchell United Kingdom 17 617 0.8× 367 0.9× 234 0.9× 190 0.9× 132 0.8× 47 1.8k
Linda Alcoff United States 10 1.2k 1.6× 597 1.5× 212 0.8× 155 0.7× 277 1.7× 24 2.1k
Avery F. Gordon United States 13 1.2k 1.5× 196 0.5× 205 0.8× 278 1.3× 240 1.4× 34 2.1k
Richard Dyer France 12 556 0.7× 471 1.2× 215 0.8× 102 0.5× 96 0.6× 46 1.4k
Ann Cvetkovich United States 13 1.0k 1.4× 385 1.0× 333 1.3× 334 1.6× 192 1.1× 33 2.2k
Ella Shohat United States 19 1.2k 1.6× 296 0.8× 247 0.9× 105 0.5× 341 2.0× 64 2.0k
Caren Kaplan United States 16 1.1k 1.5× 482 1.2× 161 0.6× 142 0.7× 325 1.9× 34 1.9k
Mary Daly United Kingdom 9 774 1.0× 427 1.1× 173 0.7× 139 0.7× 258 1.5× 16 1.8k
Anna Marie Smith United States 13 658 0.9× 318 0.8× 106 0.4× 213 1.0× 227 1.4× 36 1.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Diana Fuss

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Diana Fuss's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diana Fuss with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diana Fuss more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Diana Fuss

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diana Fuss. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diana Fuss. The network helps show where Diana Fuss may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Diana Fuss

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Diana Fuss. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Diana Fuss based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Diana Fuss. Diana Fuss is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Fuss, Diana. (2020). Dying Modern.
2.
Fuss, Diana. (2013). Oral Incorporations The Silence of the Lambs. 95–118. 2 indexed citations
3.
Fuss, Diana. (2013). How to Lose Things: Elizabeth Bishop's Child Mourning. 1 indexed citations
4.
Fuss, Diana. (2013). Below the Belt: (Un)Covering The Well of Loneliness. 238–261. 1 indexed citations
5.
Fuss, Diana. (2013). Identification Papers. 51 indexed citations
6.
Fuss, Diana. (2013). Imitation and Gender Insubordination. 18–36. 18 indexed citations
7.
Fuss, Diana. (2013). "All the Sad Young Men": AIDS and the Work of Mourning. 313–325. 5 indexed citations
8.
Fuss, Diana. (2013). Essentially Speaking. 13 indexed citations
10.
Fuss, Diana. (2013). Boys Will Be Girls: The Politics of Gay Drag. 37–75. 2 indexed citations
11.
Fuss, Diana. (2013). Believing in Fairies: The Author and The Homosexual. 190–206.
12.
Fuss, Diana. (2009). Teaching Theory. Minnesota Review. 2009(71-72). 180–188. 1 indexed citations
13.
Fuss, Diana. (2004). The Sense of an Interior. 21 indexed citations
14.
Fuss, Diana. (1996). Look Who's Talking, or If Looks Could Kill. Critical Inquiry. 22(2). 383–392. 2 indexed citations
15.
Fuss, Diana. (1995). Pink Freud. GLQ A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies. 2(1_and_2). 1–9. 2 indexed citations
16.
Fuss, Diana. (1993). The Phantom Spectator. Assemblage. 38–38. 1 indexed citations
17.
Fuss, Diana, et al.. (1993). Inside/Out: Lesbian Theories, Gay Theories. Feminist Review. 117–117. 106 indexed citations
18.
Fuss, Diana. (1992). Fashion and the Homospectatorial Look. Critical Inquiry. 18(4). 713–737. 48 indexed citations
19.
Cameron, Deborah & Diana Fuss. (1991). Essentially Speaking: Feminism, Nature & Difference. The Modern Language Review. 86(4). 959–959. 538 indexed citations breakdown →
20.
Fuss, Diana. (1988). “Essentially Speaking”: Luce Irigaray's Language of Essence. Hypatia. 3(3). 62–80. 23 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026