Anna Marie Smith

13.7k total citations · 1 hit paper
36 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

Anna Marie Smith is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science and Political Science and International Relations. According to data from OpenAlex, Anna Marie Smith has authored 36 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Gender Studies, 8 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 5 papers in Political Science and International Relations. Recurrent topics in Anna Marie Smith's work include Online Learning and Analytics (4 papers), Gender Politics and Representation (4 papers) and Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (3 papers). Anna Marie Smith is often cited by papers focused on Online Learning and Analytics (4 papers), Gender Politics and Representation (4 papers) and Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (3 papers). Anna Marie Smith collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and Canada. Anna Marie Smith's co-authors include Diana Fuss, Claire Alexander, Russell G. Larsen, D.A. Holdway, Peter J. Kelly, Laura Robinson, Frank P. Deane, John M. VanBuren, Sam Van Horne and David M. Zahrieh and has published in prestigious journals such as The FASEB Journal, FEMS Microbiology Reviews and Computers & Education.

In The Last Decade

Anna Marie Smith

33 papers receiving 956 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Essentially Speaking: Feminism, Nature and Difference

1991 564 citations Anna Marie Smith, Diana Fuss Feminist Review profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Anna Marie Smith United States	13	658	318	227	213	144	36	1.3k
Mark Blasius United States	5	590 0.9×	305 1.0×	145 0.6×	229 1.1×	75 0.5×	12	1.1k
Elspeth Probyn Australia	21	762 1.2×	433 1.4×	129 0.6×	206 1.0×	132 0.9×	68	1.7k
Clare Hemmings United Kingdom	12	755 1.1×	560 1.8×	147 0.6×	221 1.0×	93 0.6×	49	1.4k
Diana Fuss	13	747 1.1×	394 1.2×	167 0.7×	212 1.0×	154 1.1×	41	1.6k
Cherríe Moraga	9	847 1.3×	386 1.2×	107 0.5×	194 0.9×	265 1.8×	20	1.5k
Abby L. Ferber United States	16	790 1.2×	382 1.2×	237 1.0×	140 0.7×	193 1.3×	32	1.2k
Caren Kaplan United States	16	1.1k 1.7×	482 1.5×	325 1.4×	142 0.7×	85 0.6×	34	1.9k
Luther H. Martin United States	9	845 1.3×	202 0.6×	179 0.8×	136 0.6×	220 1.5×	49	1.7k
Alison M. Jaggar United States	17	840 1.3×	383 1.2×	363 1.6×	173 0.8×	180 1.3×	68	1.7k
Avery F. Gordon United States	13	1.2k 1.8×	196 0.6×	240 1.1×	278 1.3×	162 1.1×	34	2.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Marie Smith

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Marie Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Marie Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Marie Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Marie Smith

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Marie Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Marie Smith. The network helps show where Anna Marie Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anna Marie Smith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anna Marie Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anna Marie Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anna Marie Smith. Anna Marie Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

Smith, Anna Marie, et al.. (2025). Unlocking Insights: Investigating Student AI Tutor Interactions in a Large Introductory STEM Course. 451–461.

2.

Smith, Anna Marie, et al.. (2023). Instructional Strategies and Student eTextbook Reading. 613–618. 3 indexed citations

3.

Kelly, Peter J., et al.. (2020). Health literacy of people living with mental illness or substance use disorders: A systematic review. Early Intervention in Psychiatry. 15(6). 1454–1469. 23 indexed citations

4.

Smith, Anna Marie & David G. Campbell. (2020). Strategies to Address Substance-Abusing and Substance-Impaired Healthcare Professionals. ScholarWorks (Walden University). 19(1). 2 indexed citations

5.

Smith, Anna Marie, et al.. (2020). Elements of Success: Supporting at-risk student resilience through learning analytics. Computers & Education. 152. 103890–103890. 41 indexed citations

6.

Rogers, Jennifer, et al.. (2019). Course Delivery Format and Exam Performance Stratified by Question Difficulty. The FASEB Journal. 33(S1). 1 indexed citations

7.

Smith, Anna Marie. (2015). Subjectivity and Subjectivation. Oxford University Press eBooks. 955–972. 1 indexed citations

8.

Smith, Anna Marie. (2012). Deadly Force and Public Reason. Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University). 15(3). 1 indexed citations

9.

Smith, Anna Marie. (2012). Laclau and Mouffe. 11 indexed citations

10.

Smith, Anna Marie, et al.. (2010). Developing expert clinical nurses: grow them, hold them andlet them walk away. Journal of Nursing Management. 19(1). 92–97. 9 indexed citations

11.

Smith, Anna Marie. (2009). Reproductive Technology, Family Law, and the Postwelfare State: The California Same‐Sex Parents’ Rights “Victories” of 2005. Signs. 34(4). 827–850. 4 indexed citations

12.

Holdway, D.A., et al.. (2008). Multigeneration assessment of nonylphenol and endosulfan using a model Australian freshwater fish, Melanotaenia fluviatilis. Environmental Toxicology. 23(2). 253–262. 25 indexed citations

13.

Smith, Anna Marie. (2002). The Sexual Regulation Dimension of Contemporary Welfare Law: A Fifty State Overview. 8(2). 121–218. 12 indexed citations

14.

Smith, Anna Marie. (2001). Mass-market magazine portrayals of working mothers and related issues, 1987 and 1997. Journal of Children and Poverty. 7(2). 101–119. 1 indexed citations

15.

Smith, Anna Marie. (2001). Mass-market magazine portrayals of working mothers and related issues, 1987 and 1997. Journal of Children and Poverty. 7(2). 101–119. 6 indexed citations

16.

Alexander, Claire & Anna Marie Smith. (1996). New Right Discourse on Race and Sexuality: Britain 1968-1990. Feminist Review. 113–113. 70 indexed citations

17.

Waters, Chris & Anna Marie Smith. (1996). The Pink and the Black. Transition. 210–210. 2 indexed citations

18.

Smith, Anna Marie. (1993). ‘What is Pornography?’: An Analysis of the Policy Statement of the Campaign against Pornography and Censorship. Feminist Review. 43(1). 71–87. 4 indexed citations

19.

Smith, Anna Marie. (1991). Essentially Speaking: Feminism, Nature and Difference. Feminist Review. 38(1). 109–112. 70 indexed citations

20.

Smith, Anna Marie & Diana Fuss. (1991). Essentially Speaking: Feminism, Nature and Difference. Feminist Review. 109–109. 564 indexed citations breakdown →

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact