Diana E. Pankevich
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 10%
- Sensory Systems top 2%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Nutrition and Dietetics top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Co-authors
- Michael J. BaumJames A. CherryTracy L. BaleBruce M. AltevogtFred H. GageJohn DunlopSarah L. TeegardenCatherine L. Jensen
- Topics
- Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (5 papers)Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (5 papers)Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (3 papers)
- Journals
- ScienceNeuronJournal of Neuroscience
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomFrance
In The Last Decade
Diana E. Pankevich
14 papers receiving 660 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 223
- Sensory Systems 207
- Social Psychology 146
- Nutrition and Dietetics 127
- Molecular Biology 116
Countries citing papers authored by Diana E. Pankevich
This map shows the geographic impact of Diana E. Pankevich's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diana E. Pankevich with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diana E. Pankevich more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Diana E. Pankevich
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diana E. Pankevich. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diana E. Pankevich. The network helps show where Diana E. Pankevich may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Diana E. Pankevich
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Diana E. Pankevich. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Diana E. Pankevich based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Diana E. Pankevich. Diana E. Pankevich is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 148 | |
| 2 | Improving and Accelerating Therapeutic Development for Nervous System Disorders: Workshop Summary | 26 |
| 3 | International Animal Research Regulations: Impact on Neuroscience Research: Workshop Summary | 17 |
| 4 | COMMITTEE ON THE USE OF CHIMPANZEES IN BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH | 1 |
| 5 | 12 | |
| 6 | 111 | |
| 7 | 67 | |
| 8 | 22 | |
| 9 | 59 | |
| 10 | 27 | |
| 11 | 162 | |
| 12 | 9 | |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | 13 |
About Diana E. Pankevich
Diana E. Pankevich is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Behavioral Neuroscience and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 14 papers that have together received 680 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (5 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (5 papers) and Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (207 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (70 citations) and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (100 citations). Diana E. Pankevich has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and France. Frequent co-authors include Michael J. Baum, James A. Cherry, Tracy L. Bale, Bruce M. Altevogt, Fred H. Gage, John Dunlop, Sarah L. Teegarden, Catherine L. Jensen, Becky Brockel and Bridget R. Mueller. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Neuron and Journal of Neuroscience.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.