Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Shape of the River
1998645 citationsWilliam G. Bowen, Derek BokPrinceton University Press eBooksprofile →
Universities in the Marketplace
2009225 citationsDerek BokPrinceton University Press eBooksprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Derek Bok's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Derek Bok with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Derek Bok more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Derek Bok. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Derek Bok. The network helps show where Derek Bok may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Derek Bok
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Derek Bok.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Derek Bok based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Derek Bok. Derek Bok is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Bowen, William G. & Derek Bok. (2019). The Shape of the River. Princeton University Press eBooks.5 indexed citations
3.
Alves, Nuno de Almeida, Mário Centeno, Álvaro A. Novo, & Derek Bok. (2010). INVESTMENT IN EDUCATION IN PORTUGAL: RETURNS AND HETEROGENEITY*. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.5 indexed citations
4.
Bok, Derek. (2009). Universities in the Marketplace. Princeton University Press eBooks.225 indexed citations breakdown →
Bok, Derek. (2003). Perils of the Entrepreneurial University.. 11(3). 8–14.1 indexed citations
10.
Sugrue, Thomas J., Eric Foner, Albert Camarillo, et al.. (1999). The Compelling Need for Diversity in Higher Education.. A18–A18.63 indexed citations
11.
Bowen, William J. & Derek Bok. (1998). Why Race-Conscious Admissions Make Sense.. The College Board review.1 indexed citations
12.
Bok, Derek. (1997). On our best behavior. The New York times book review. 34.6 indexed citations
13.
Bok, Derek. (1991). Universities: Their Temptations and Tensions.. Journal of college and university law. 18(1). 1–19.1 indexed citations
14.
Bok, Derek. (1988). Can higher education foster higher morals. Business and Society Review. 66(1998).27 indexed citations
15.
Bok, Derek. (1986). Text of Harvard President Derek Bok's Response to Education Secretary Bennett.. The chronicle of higher education. 33(8). 17–19.1 indexed citations
16.
Bok, Derek. (1985). Reflections on Free Speech: An Open Letter to the Harvard Community.. Educational record. 66(1). 4–8.1 indexed citations
17.
Bok, Derek. (1983). A Flawed System of Law Practice and Training.. Journal of legal education. 33(4).31 indexed citations
18.
Bok, Derek. (1980). The Federal Government and the University.. The Public interest.3 indexed citations
19.
Bok, Derek. (1974). On the Purposes of Undergraduate Education.. Daedalus.8 indexed citations
20.
Bok, Derek, et al.. (1971). Labor and the American Community.. Industrial and Labor Relations Review. 24(4). 624–624.122 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.