Dennis Mock
- Molecular Biology
- Immunology top 10%
- Ophthalmology top 5%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 10%
- Oncology
- Co-authors
- Daniela Samaniego‐CastruitaAshu ChawlaGrégory SeumoisLukas ChávezMitchell KronenbergPandurangan VijayanandBrandie WhiteIsaac Engel
- Topics
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders (7 papers)T-cell and B-cell Immunology (3 papers)interferon and immune responses (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomSouth Korea
In The Last Decade
Dennis Mock
21 papers receiving 764 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
- Molecular Biology 295
- Immunology 285
- Ophthalmology 138
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 115
- Oncology 85
Countries citing papers authored by Dennis Mock
This map shows the geographic impact of Dennis Mock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dennis Mock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dennis Mock more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dennis Mock
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dennis Mock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dennis Mock. The network helps show where Dennis Mock may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dennis Mock
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dennis Mock. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dennis Mock based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dennis Mock. Dennis Mock is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 223 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 12 | |
| 4 | Detection of Glaucoma Progression by Optic Disc Photographs Evaluation and Fast Component of the Visual Field Rate of Progression | 1 |
| 5 | 24 | |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | 28 | |
| 8 | Functional and Structural Rates of Glaucoma Progression Are Poorly Correlated | 1 |
| 9 | The Visual Field Index (VFI) Behaves Erratically Near the Advanced Field Loss Mean Deviation Value | 1 |
| 10 | 72 | |
| 11 | 69 | |
| 12 | Rates of Damage in Glaucoma: Techniques to Measure Rates of Regional Visual Field Change | 1 |
| 13 | 31 | |
| 14 | 5 | |
| 15 | 11 | |
| 16 | 180 | |
| 17 | 29 | |
| 18 | 19 | |
| 19 | 6 | |
| 20 | 22 |
About Dennis Mock
Dennis Mock is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Medical Laboratory Technology and Biological Psychiatry, having authored 21 papers that have together received 774 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glaucoma and retinal disorders (7 papers), T-cell and B-cell Immunology (3 papers) and interferon and immune responses (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (138 citations), Immunology (285 citations) and Sensory Systems (46 citations). Dennis Mock has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Daniela Samaniego‐Castruita, Ashu Chawla, Grégory Seumois, Lukas Chávez, Mitchell Kronenberg, Pandurangan Vijayanand, Brandie White, Isaac Engel, Joseph Caprioli and Elena Bitrian. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Genes & Development and Nature Immunology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.