Joon Mo Kim

1.9k citations
94 papers · 1.4k · h-index 22

Impact in

Papers in

Joon Mo Kim

87 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Joon Mo Kim
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Ophthalmology 1.1k
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 714
  • Neurology 120
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 132
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 171
Replace Gabriele Fuchsjäger‐Mayrl with:
Gabriele Fuchsjäger‐Mayrl Austria
Mesut Erdurmuş Türkiye
Shimpei Sato Japan
Ingrid Adamsons United States
Anders Behndig Sweden
Robert D. Steigerwalt Italy
Sedat Arıkan Türkiye
Turgut Yılmaz Türkiye
Yutaka Kikuchi Japan
Joon Mo Kim relative to Gabriele Fuchsjäger‐Mayrl Austria Gabriele Fuchsjäger‐Mayrl's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.8×
Gabriele Fuchsjäger‐Mayrl · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Joon Mo Kim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joon Mo Kim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joon Mo Kim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joon Mo Kim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joon Mo Kim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joon Mo Kim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joon Mo Kim. The network helps show where Joon Mo Kim may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Joon Mo Kim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Joon Mo Kim Line = papers co-authored together Joon Mo Kim links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 94 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012102
2 201766
3 200958
4 200951
5 201243
6 201239
7 201937
8 201536
9 200834
10 201033
11 201232
12 200929
13 201629
14 202028
15 201628
16 201628
17 201528
18 200427
19 201624
20 201624

About Joon Mo Kim

Joon Mo Kim is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Neurology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 94 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glaucoma and retinal disorders (75 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (47 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (29 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (16 papers), Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (12 papers), Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis (8 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (8 papers) and Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (1.1k citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (714 citations), Neurology (120 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (132 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (171 citations). Joon Mo Kim has collaborated with scholars based in South Korea, United States and Ethiopia. Frequent co-authors include Ki Ho Park, Chul Young Choi, Seong Hee Shim, Tae‐Woo Kim, Chan Yun Kim, Mi Yeon Lee, Joseph Caprioli, Ki Ho Park, Dong‐Myung Kim and Jeong Hun Bae. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Glaucoma, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology, PLoS ONE and Current Eye Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact