Denise Monte Braz

26 papers receiving 164 citations

Peers

Denise Monte Braz
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 111
  • Plant Science 54
  • Molecular Biology 44
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 30
  • Food Science 15
Replace Massimo G. Bovini with:
Massimo G. Bovini Brazil
Flávia Cristina Pinto Garcia Brazil
Ana Carolina Devides Castello Brazil
Cyl Farney Catarino de Sá Brazil
Renata Corrêa Martins Brazil
Liliana Essi Brazil
João Marcelo Alvarenga Braga Brazil
Rosângela Simão‐Bianchini Brazil
Jefferson Rodrigues Maciel Brazil
Tarcíso de Sousa Filgueiras Brazil
Denise Monte Braz relative to Massimo G. Bovini Brazil Massimo G. Bovini's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Massimo G. Bovini · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Denise Monte Braz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Denise Monte Braz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Denise Monte Braz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Denise Monte Braz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Denise Monte Braz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Denise Monte Braz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Denise Monte Braz. The network helps show where Denise Monte Braz may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Denise Monte Braz

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Denise Monte Braz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Denise Monte Braz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Denise Monte Braz. Denise Monte Braz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 1
2 1
3 1
4 3
5 1
6 1
7 6
8 7
9 8
10 3
11 12
12 20
13 3
14 2
15 2
16
Revisão taxonômica de Staurogyne Wall. (Acanthaceae) nos neotrópicos
1
17 21
18 30
19
Reproductive aspects of Acanthaceae Juss. species of a forest fragment in Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
5
20
Aspectos reprodutivos de espécies de Acanthaceae juss. de um fragmento florestal do município de Viçosa, Minas Gerais
10

About Denise Monte Braz

Denise Monte Braz is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Forestry and Soil Science, having authored 26 papers that have together received 169 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Diversity and Evolution (20 papers), Plant and animal studies (19 papers) and Fern and Epiphyte Biology (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (111 citations), Forestry (11 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (30 citations). Denise Monte Braz has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil, United States and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Rita Maria de Carvalho-Okano, Cíntia Kameyama, Reinaldo Monteiro, Milene Faria Vieira, Marcos Gervásio Pereira, Marcelo Elias Fraga, Pedro Germano Filho, Lana da Silva Sylvestre, Joecildo Francisco Rocha and Genise Vieira Somner. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Ethnopharmacology and Systematic Botany.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026