Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by Denise Jodelet
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Denise Jodelet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Denise Jodelet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Denise Jodelet more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Denise Jodelet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Denise Jodelet. The network helps show where Denise Jodelet may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Denise Jodelet
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Denise Jodelet.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Denise Jodelet based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Denise Jodelet. Denise Jodelet is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Jodelet, Denise. (2014). The Imaginary Formation of Cultural Otherness. 23(2).2 indexed citations
3.
Jodelet, Denise. (2013). Psychosocial problems of the investigation on the concept of subject. LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas).1 indexed citations
4.
Jodelet, Denise. (2013). Encounters Between Forms of Knowledge. 22(1).3 indexed citations
5.
Jodelet, Denise. (2013). La place des représentations sociales dans l´éducation thérapeutique. Education permanente. 37–46.10 indexed citations
6.
Jodelet, Denise. (2011). Ponto de vista: sobre o movimento das representações sociais na comunidade científica. Temas em Psicologia. 19(1). 19–26.2 indexed citations
7.
Jodelet, Denise. (2011). Aportes del enfoque de las representaciones sociales al campo de la educación. CIC-Digital (Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas de la Provincia de Buenos Aires). 21(21). 133–154.25 indexed citations
8.
Jodelet, Denise. (2011). 3. L’approche de la dimension sociale dans la psychologie communautaire. Cairn.info. 27–40.1 indexed citations
9.
Jodelet, Denise. (2011). Ponto de vista: sobre o movimento das representações sociais na comunidade científica brasileira. Temas em Psicologia. 19(1). 19–26.12 indexed citations
10.
Camargo, Brígido Vizeu, Ana Maria Justo, & Denise Jodelet. (2010). Normas, Representações Sociais e Práticas Corporais. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.15 indexed citations
11.
Jodelet, Denise. (2010). La memoria de los lugares urbanos. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 20(39). 81–89.15 indexed citations
Jodelet, Denise, et al.. (1996). Cognición, representación y apropiación del espacio. Dipòsit Digital de la Universitat de Barcelona (Universitat de Barcelona).7 indexed citations
18.
Jodelet, Denise. (1993). El lado moral y afectivo de la historia. Un ejemplo de memoria de masas: el proceso a K. Barbie, "el carnicero de Lyon". 53–72.3 indexed citations
19.
Jodelet, Denise & Gerard Duveen. (1991). Madness and social representations.201 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.