Denise Dahlhoff

18 total papers · 586 total citations
2 papers, 402 citations indexed

About

Denise Dahlhoff is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Accounting and Infectious Diseases. According to data from OpenAlex, Denise Dahlhoff has authored 2 papers receiving a total of 402 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 2 papers in Strategy and Management, 1 paper in Accounting and 0 papers in Infectious Diseases. Recurrent topics in Denise Dahlhoff's work include Innovation and Knowledge Management (1 paper), Corporate Governance and Management (1 paper) and Corporate Finance and Governance (1 paper). Denise Dahlhoff is often cited by papers focused on Innovation and Knowledge Management (1 paper), Corporate Governance and Management (1 paper) and Corporate Finance and Governance (1 paper). Denise Dahlhoff collaborates with scholars based in United States. Denise Dahlhoff's co-authors include Vithala R. Rao, Manoj K. Agarwal and Hermann Simon and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Marketing and Controlling.

In The Last Decade

Denise Dahlhoff

1 paper receiving 370 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author						Papers	Cites
Denise Dahlhoff	239	173	131	93	82	2	402
Liwu Hsu	134 0.6×	102 0.6×	68 0.5×	63 0.7×	133 1.6×	8	332
Gary L. McLaughlin	85 0.4×	179 1.0×	92 0.7×	63 0.7×	49 0.6×	5	333
Matthias Bucerius	73 0.3×	294 1.7×	199 1.5×	102 1.1×	41 0.5×	5	440
John S. Y. Chiu	214 0.9×	75 0.4×	136 1.0×	103 1.1×	37 0.5×	9	428
Vanessa Magness	212 0.9×	332 1.9×	137 1.0×	56 0.6×	32 0.4×	9	420
Dian‐Yan Liou	154 0.6×	249 1.4×	92 0.7×	35 0.4×	61 0.7×	9	379
Rajshree Prakash	55 0.2×	163 0.9×	125 1.0×	154 1.7×	64 0.8×	6	359
Caterina Tantalo	164 0.7×	286 1.7×	61 0.5×	87 0.9×	64 0.8×	4	432
Priyanka Aggarwal	190 0.8×	280 1.6×	127 1.0×	43 0.5×	27 0.3×	11	411
W. Chad Carlos	117 0.5×	280 1.6×	102 0.8×	94 1.0×	75 0.9×	12	397

Countries citing papers authored by Denise Dahlhoff

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Denise Dahlhoff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Denise Dahlhoff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Denise Dahlhoff more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Denise Dahlhoff

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Denise Dahlhoff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Denise Dahlhoff. The network helps show where Denise Dahlhoff may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Denise Dahlhoff

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Denise Dahlhoff. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Denise Dahlhoff based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Denise Dahlhoff. Denise Dahlhoff is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact