Denis Larrivée

638 citations
29 papers · 511 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Denis Larrivée

24 papers receiving 493 citations

Peers

Denis Larrivée
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 194
  • Aging 11
  • Molecular Biology 323
  • Cell Biology 71
  • Immunology 83
Replace Lawrence S. Hsieh with:
Lawrence S. Hsieh United States
Ana Franco‐Villanueva United States
M. Chaminade France
Alexandros K. Kanellopoulos Switzerland
Verónica González-Núñez Spain
Roderic L. Smith United States
Dorota A. Crawford Canada
Jennings Xu United States
Salomé Calado Botelho Sweden
Luis A. Martinez United States
Denis Larrivée relative to Lawrence S. Hsieh United States Lawrence S. Hsieh's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.0×
Lawrence S. Hsieh · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Denis Larrivée

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Denis Larrivée's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Denis Larrivée with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Denis Larrivée more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Denis Larrivée

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Denis Larrivée. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Denis Larrivée. The network helps show where Denis Larrivée may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Denis Larrivée, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Denis Larrivée Line = papers co-authored together Denis Larrivée links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1989170
2 198181
3 199473
4 198240
5 198629
6 198720
7 198715
8 198214
9 201611
10 201711
11
A BIOCHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF THE DROSOPHILA RHABDOMERE AND ITS EXTRACELLULAR ENVIRONMENT
19798
12 20186
13 20196
14 19806
15 20144
16 19824
17 20213
18 20212
19 20242
20 19902

About Denis Larrivée

Denis Larrivée is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Cell Biology and Social Psychology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 511 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (4 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (4 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (4 papers), Neurological disorders and treatments (3 papers), Microtubule and mitosis dynamics (3 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (2 papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (2 papers) and Action Observation and Synchronization (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (194 citations), Aging (11 citations), Molecular Biology (323 citations), Cell Biology (71 citations) and Immunology (83 citations). Denis Larrivée has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Spain and Italy. Frequent co-authors include William L. Pak, Stephan Schneuwly, Randall D. Shortridge, Tomoko Ono, Michitaka Ozaki, Sandro Conrad, Robert S. Stephenson, Bernice Grafstein, Megan Lo and James A. Mortimer. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, Journal of Neurochemistry, The Journal of Cell Biology, Journal of Religion and Health and Neurochemical Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact