Denis J. McConalogue
- Computational Mechanics top 5%
- Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality top 5%
- Statistics and Probability top 5%
- Biomedical Engineering
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty top 5%
- Co-authors
- R. S. SrivastavaRobert ClérouxLaurence A. BaxterAntónio PachecoErnest M. ScheuerWallace R. BlischkeE. McLaughlin
- Topics
- Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows (3 papers)Rheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies (2 papers)Image and Signal Denoising Methods (1 paper)
- Cited by
- Statistics and ProbabilitySafety, Risk, Reliability and QualityStatistics, Probability and Uncertainty
- Partner nations
- United KingdomNetherlandsUnited States
In The Last Decade
Denis J. McConalogue
8 papers receiving 347 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
- Computational Mechanics 150
- Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 79
- Statistics and Probability 73
- Biomedical Engineering 59
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 57
Countries citing papers authored by Denis J. McConalogue
This map shows the geographic impact of Denis J. McConalogue's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Denis J. McConalogue with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Denis J. McConalogue more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Denis J. McConalogue
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Denis J. McConalogue. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Denis J. McConalogue. The network helps show where Denis J. McConalogue may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Denis J. McConalogue
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Denis J. McConalogue. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Denis J. McConalogue based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Denis J. McConalogue. Denis J. McConalogue is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 20 | |
| 2 | 50 | |
| 3 | 35 | |
| 4 | 63 | |
| 5 | 24 | |
| 6 | 28 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 141 |
About Denis J. McConalogue
Denis J. McConalogue is a scholar working on Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes, Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design and Computational Mechanics, having authored 8 papers that have together received 367 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows (3 papers), Rheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies (2 papers) and Image and Signal Denoising Methods (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics and Probability (73 citations), Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (79 citations) and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (57 citations). Denis J. McConalogue has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include R. S. Srivastava, Robert Cléroux, Laurence A. Baxter, António Pacheco, Ernest M. Scheuer, Wallace R. Blischke and E. McLaughlin. Their work appears in journals such as Technometrics, Management Science and Molecular Physics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.