Denis Chmoulevitch
About
In The Last Decade
Denis Chmoulevitch
4 papers receiving 354 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Sociology and Political Science 229
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 112
- Education 94
- Clinical Psychology 62
- Applied Psychology 61
Countries citing papers authored by Denis Chmoulevitch
This map shows the geographic impact of Denis Chmoulevitch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Denis Chmoulevitch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Denis Chmoulevitch more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Denis Chmoulevitch
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Denis Chmoulevitch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Denis Chmoulevitch. The network helps show where Denis Chmoulevitch may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Denis Chmoulevitch
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Denis Chmoulevitch. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Denis Chmoulevitch based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Denis Chmoulevitch. Denis Chmoulevitch is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 37 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | Smartphone addiction is increasing across the world: A meta-analysis of 24 countries breakdown → | 230 |
| 4 | 94 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.