Debra M. Wolf

24 papers receiving 302 citations

Peers

Debra M. Wolf
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Research and Theory 11
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 15
  • General Health Professions 194
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 34
  • Health Information Management 28
Replace Vicki L. Buchda with:
Vicki L. Buchda United States
Achir Yani S. Hamid Indonesia
Seung‐Hye Choi South Korea
Nefise Bahçecik Türkiye
Jane Wilcockson United Kingdom
Nancy O’Connor United States
Sameh Eltaybani Japan
Louise Hoyle United Kingdom
Sarah Sims United Kingdom
Laís Helena Ramos Brazil
Debra M. Wolf relative to Vicki L. Buchda United States Vicki L. Buchda's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Vicki L. Buchda · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Debra M. Wolf

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Debra M. Wolf's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Debra M. Wolf with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Debra M. Wolf more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Debra M. Wolf

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Debra M. Wolf. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Debra M. Wolf. The network helps show where Debra M. Wolf may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Debra M. Wolf, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Debra M. Wolf Line = papers co-authored together Debra M. Wolf links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20230
2 20214
3 20212
4 201921
5 20193
6 20154
7 20143
8 20143
9 20142
10 20132
11 201225
12
Social Media for Nurses: Educating Practitioners and Patients in a Networked World
20129
13
Shaping the future of nursing education today using distant education and technology.
201010
14
Clinical decision support. How CDS tools impact patient care outcomes.
20092
15 2008148
16 200836
17 20082
18 20073
19 200612
20
A suicide prevention center in Chicago.
19682

About Debra M. Wolf

Debra M. Wolf is a scholar working on Library and Information Sciences, Health Information Management, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology and Health, having authored 26 papers that have together received 327 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Online and Blended Learning (3 papers), Electronic Health Records Systems (3 papers), Social Media in Health Education (3 papers), Occupational Health and Safety Research (3 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (2 papers), Workplace Health and Well-being (2 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (2 papers) and Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (11 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (15 citations), General Health Professions (194 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (34 citations) and Health Information Management (28 citations). Debra M. Wolf has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Taiwan and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Leslie A. Hoffman, Thomas G. Zullo, Robert Quinlin, Lisa Lehman, Janice Manzi Sabatine, John Wenskovitch, Margaret Rosenzweig, Pamela K. Greenhouse, Kathleen C. Spadaro and Meigan Robb. Their work appears in journals such as JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration, CIN Computers Informatics Nursing, Journal of Nursing Care Quality, Journal of International Students and Nurse Educator.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026