Deborah V. Brazeal

1.3k total citations
20 papers, 676 citations indexed

About

Deborah V. Brazeal is a scholar working on Management of Technology and Innovation, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Deborah V. Brazeal has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 676 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Management of Technology and Innovation, 7 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 7 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management. Recurrent topics in Deborah V. Brazeal's work include Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (15 papers), Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (6 papers) and Family Business Performance and Succession (4 papers). Deborah V. Brazeal is often cited by papers focused on Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (15 papers), Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (6 papers) and Family Business Performance and Succession (4 papers). Deborah V. Brazeal collaborates with scholars based in United States. Deborah V. Brazeal's co-authors include Norris Krueger, Theodore T. Herbert, Michael C. White, William H. Friedman, Mark T. Schenkel, Rebecca G. Long, K. Mark Weaver, William C. McDowell and Michael G. Dow and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Business Research, Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice.

In The Last Decade

Deborah V. Brazeal

17 papers receiving 559 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Deborah V. Brazeal United States 9 489 232 138 123 107 20 676
Michelle D. Lane United States 8 431 0.9× 219 0.9× 135 1.0× 163 1.3× 58 0.5× 17 697
Montserrat Entrialgo Spain 10 444 0.9× 234 1.0× 124 0.9× 182 1.5× 73 0.7× 17 605
Lloyd W. Fernald United States 11 443 0.9× 265 1.1× 106 0.8× 102 0.8× 113 1.1× 20 683
Mauri Laukkanen Finland 10 360 0.7× 154 0.7× 148 1.1× 85 0.7× 51 0.5× 16 609
Eren Ozgen United States 6 594 1.2× 270 1.2× 213 1.5× 221 1.8× 147 1.4× 11 782
Simon Bridge United Kingdom 10 367 0.8× 180 0.8× 109 0.8× 75 0.6× 91 0.9× 22 584
Gina Santos Portugal 11 375 0.8× 199 0.9× 105 0.8× 121 1.0× 47 0.4× 29 632
Maximilian Goethner Germany 11 631 1.3× 281 1.2× 72 0.5× 183 1.5× 142 1.3× 19 795
Joyce K.H. Nga Malaysia 8 443 0.9× 274 1.2× 80 0.6× 253 2.1× 152 1.4× 11 801
Jurie van Vuuren South Africa 13 371 0.8× 204 0.9× 84 0.6× 144 1.2× 82 0.8× 35 562

Countries citing papers authored by Deborah V. Brazeal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Deborah V. Brazeal's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deborah V. Brazeal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deborah V. Brazeal more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Deborah V. Brazeal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deborah V. Brazeal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deborah V. Brazeal. The network helps show where Deborah V. Brazeal may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Deborah V. Brazeal

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Deborah V. Brazeal. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Deborah V. Brazeal based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Deborah V. Brazeal. Deborah V. Brazeal is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Schenkel, Mark T., William C. McDowell, & Deborah V. Brazeal. (2024). Business model novelty and small firm innovativeness: the relationship with need for closure and creative self-efficacy. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal. 20(1). 141–162. 4 indexed citations
2.
Brazeal, Deborah V., et al.. (2023). Innovations as Art: Using the Childhood Magic of Play-Doh to Craft Entrepreneurial Ideas. Management Teaching Review. 10(1). 8–20. 1 indexed citations
3.
Krueger, Norris & Deborah V. Brazeal. (2018). Potencial Empreendedor E Empreendedores EM Potencial (Entrepreneurial Potential and Potential Entrepreneurs). SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations
4.
Krueger, Norris & Deborah V. Brazeal. (2018). Potencial Empreendedor e Empreendedores em Potencial. LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas). 86 indexed citations
5.
Krueger, Norris & Deborah V. Brazeal. (2018). Potencial Empreendedor e Empreendedores em Potencial. Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja). 7(2). 201–226. 2 indexed citations
6.
Brazeal, Deborah V., et al.. (2018). A socio-cultural approach to multicultural experience: Why interactions matter for creative thinking but exposures don’t. International Journal of Intercultural Relations. 64. 29–42. 26 indexed citations
7.
Schenkel, Mark T. & Deborah V. Brazeal. (2016). The Effect of Pro-Entrepreneurial Architectures and Relational Influences on Innovative Behavior in a Flat Organizational Structure. Journal of business & entrepreneurship. 27(2). 93.
8.
Brazeal, Deborah V., et al.. (2014). Beyond the Organizational Bounds in CE Research: Exploring Personal and Relational Factors in a Flat Organizational Structure. The Journal of Applied Management and Entrepreneurship. 19(2). 78–106. 5 indexed citations
9.
Schenkel, Mark T., et al.. (2013). Pathways in the Development of Entrepreneurial Intent: Exploring the Roles of Prior Experience, Sex and Family Business. Journal of business & entrepreneurship. 24(2). 47. 5 indexed citations
11.
Herbert, Theodore T. & Deborah V. Brazeal. (2004). The Corporation of the (near) Future: Re-Defining Traditional Structures for Innovation, Adaptability, and Entrepreneurship. Journal of business & entrepreneurship. 16(2). 115. 1 indexed citations
12.
Long, Rebecca G., Michael C. White, William H. Friedman, & Deborah V. Brazeal. (2000). The `Qualitative' Versus `Quantitative' Research Debate: A Question of Metaphorical Assumptions?. International Journal of Value-Based Management. 13(2). 189–197. 26 indexed citations
13.
Brazeal, Deborah V. & Theodore T. Herbert. (1999). The Genesis of Entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 23(3). 29–46. 226 indexed citations
14.
White, Michael C., et al.. (1997). The Evolution of Organizations: Suggestions from Complexity Theory About the Interplay Between Natural Selection and Adaptation. Human Relations. 50(11). 1383–1401. 30 indexed citations
15.
White, Michael C., et al.. (1997). . Human Relations. 50(11). 1383–1401. 1 indexed citations
16.
Brazeal, Deborah V.. (1996). Managing an entrepreneurial organizational environment. Journal of Business Research. 35(1). 55–67. 13 indexed citations
17.
Krueger, Norris & Deborah V. Brazeal. (1994). Entrepreneurial Potential and Potential Entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 18(2). 201–104. 139 indexed citations
18.
Brazeal, Deborah V.. (1993). Organizing for internally developed corporate ventures. Journal of Business Venturing. 8(1). 75–90. 88 indexed citations
20.
Weaver, K. Mark, Deborah V. Brazeal, & Michael G. Dow. (1989). Anatomy of a Success: Links Between Theory and Practice. The Journal of Creative Behavior. 23(3). 162–171. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026