Deborah Lynn Guber
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law top 2%
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- Marketing top 10%
- Topics
- Electoral Systems and Political Participation (3 papers)Rhetoric and Communication Studies (2 papers)Environmental Education and Sustainability (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Deborah Lynn Guber
13 papers receiving 387 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Sociology and Political Science 278
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 217
- Political Science and International Relations 82
- Economics and Econometrics 70
- Marketing 56
Countries citing papers authored by Deborah Lynn Guber
This map shows the geographic impact of Deborah Lynn Guber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deborah Lynn Guber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deborah Lynn Guber more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Deborah Lynn Guber
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deborah Lynn Guber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deborah Lynn Guber. The network helps show where Deborah Lynn Guber may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Deborah Lynn Guber
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Deborah Lynn Guber. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Deborah Lynn Guber based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Deborah Lynn Guber. Deborah Lynn Guber is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 16 | |
| 3 | The American Political System | 1 |
| 4 | 188 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | Maintaining Presence: Environmental Advocacy and the Permanent Campaign | 9 |
| 7 | The Grassroots of a Green Revolution: Polling America on the Environment | 74 |
| 8 | 29 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 43 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | 8 | |
| 13 | Environmental concern and the dimensionality problem : A new approach to an old predicament | 33 |
About Deborah Lynn Guber
Deborah Lynn Guber is a scholar working on General Social Sciences, Communication and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, having authored 13 papers that have together received 420 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (3 papers), Rhetoric and Communication Studies (2 papers) and Environmental Education and Sustainability (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (217 citations), Communication (51 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (278 citations). Deborah Lynn Guber has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Riley E. Dunlap, Christopher J. Bosso and Jeremiah Bohr. Their work appears in journals such as Public Opinion Quarterly, American Behavioral Scientist and Society & Natural Resources.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.