Deborah J. Thompson
- Genetics top 0.2%
- Molecular Biology top 5%
- Cancer Research top 1%
- Oncology top 2%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 0.5%
- Co-authors
- Douglas F. EastonD. Gareth EvansNazneen RahmanMichael R. StrattonSheila SealRita BarfootAnthony RenwickDiana Eccles
- Topics
- BRCA gene mutations in cancer (22 papers)Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (16 papers)Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (11 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Deborah J. Thompson
92 papers receiving 5.9k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 147
- Genetics 3.2k
- Molecular Biology 2.3k
- Cancer Research 1.6k
- Oncology 1.4k
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 1.3k
Countries citing papers authored by Deborah J. Thompson
This map shows the geographic impact of Deborah J. Thompson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deborah J. Thompson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deborah J. Thompson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Deborah J. Thompson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deborah J. Thompson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deborah J. Thompson. The network helps show where Deborah J. Thompson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Deborah J. Thompson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Deborah J. Thompson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Deborah J. Thompson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Deborah J. Thompson. Deborah J. Thompson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 29 | |
| 3 | 18 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 40 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 135 | |
| 8 | 22 | |
| 9 | 50 | |
| 10 | 18 | |
| 11 | 33 | |
| 12 | 30 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | PALB2, which encodes a BRCA2-interacting protein, is a breast cancer susceptibility genebreakdown → | 689 |
| 15 | 88 | |
| 16 | 43 | |
| 17 | 179 | |
| 18 | 13 | |
| 19 | 58 | |
| 20 | 14 |
About Deborah J. Thompson
Deborah J. Thompson is a scholar working on Genetics, Geriatrics and Gerontology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 95 papers that have together received 6.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include BRCA gene mutations in cancer (22 papers), Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (16 papers) and Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (3.2k citations), Cancer Research (1.6k citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (1.3k citations). Deborah J. Thompson has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Douglas F. Easton, D. Gareth Evans, Nazneen Rahman, Michael R. Stratton, Sheila Seal, Rita Barfoot, Anthony Renwick, Diana Eccles, Patrick Kelly and Tasnim Chagtai. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, Nature Communications and Nature Genetics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.