Deborah J. Hellawell
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 0.5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 1%
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition top 2%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Co-authors
- Andrew W. YoungDennis C. HayJohn P. AggletonMichael JohnsonAndrew J. CalderSophie K. ScottJ. Richard HanleyPaul Broks
- Topics
- Face Recognition and Perception (14 papers)Deception detection and forensic psychology (6 papers)Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (5 papers)
- Cited by
- Cognitive NeuroscienceExperimental and Cognitive PsychologyComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Partner nations
- United KingdomNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Deborah J. Hellawell
27 papers receiving 2.7k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
- Cognitive Neuroscience 2.4k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 955
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 581
- Social Psychology 383
- Psychiatry and Mental health 238
Countries citing papers authored by Deborah J. Hellawell
This map shows the geographic impact of Deborah J. Hellawell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deborah J. Hellawell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deborah J. Hellawell more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Deborah J. Hellawell
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deborah J. Hellawell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deborah J. Hellawell. The network helps show where Deborah J. Hellawell may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Deborah J. Hellawell
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Deborah J. Hellawell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Deborah J. Hellawell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Deborah J. Hellawell. Deborah J. Hellawell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 69 | |
| 2 | 12 | |
| 3 | 25 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 67 | |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | 427 | |
| 10 | 158 | |
| 11 | 323 | |
| 12 | 41 | |
| 13 | 46 | |
| 14 | 78 | |
| 15 | 46 | |
| 16 | 31 | |
| 17 | 64 | |
| 18 | 71 | |
| 19 | 60 | |
| 20 | 103 |
About Deborah J. Hellawell
Deborah J. Hellawell is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology and Family Practice, having authored 27 papers that have together received 2.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Face Recognition and Perception (14 papers), Deception detection and forensic psychology (6 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (2.4k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (955 citations) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (581 citations). Deborah J. Hellawell has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Andrew W. Young, Dennis C. Hay, John P. Aggleton, Michael Johnson, Andrew J. Calder, Sophie K. Scott, J. Richard Hanley, Paul Broks, Edward H.F. de Haan and Brian T. Pentland. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Brain.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.