Deborah D. Blecic

531 total citations
19 papers, 419 citations indexed

About

Deborah D. Blecic is a scholar working on Information Systems, General Health Professions and History and Philosophy of Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Deborah D. Blecic has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 419 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Information Systems, 5 papers in General Health Professions and 4 papers in History and Philosophy of Science. Recurrent topics in Deborah D. Blecic's work include Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (9 papers), Health Sciences Research and Education (5 papers) and scientometrics and bibliometrics research (4 papers). Deborah D. Blecic is often cited by papers focused on Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (9 papers), Health Sciences Research and Education (5 papers) and scientometrics and bibliometrics research (4 papers). Deborah D. Blecic collaborates with scholars based in United States. Deborah D. Blecic's co-authors include Stephen E. Wiberley, Julie M. Hurd, Sandra L. De Groote, Ann C. Weller, Mary Shultz, Josephine L. Dorsch, Cynthia L. Henderson, Ann E. Robinson, Kimberly L. Armstrong and John Cullars and has published in prestigious journals such as College & Research Libraries, Journal of the Medical Library Association JMLA and Science & Technology Libraries.

In The Last Decade

Deborah D. Blecic

19 papers receiving 356 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Deborah D. Blecic United States 13 300 102 101 80 52 19 419
K.T. L. Vaughan United States 9 199 0.7× 75 0.7× 100 1.0× 30 0.4× 74 1.4× 24 351
Carol Hansen Montgomery United States 11 261 0.9× 62 0.6× 49 0.5× 39 0.5× 40 0.8× 15 340
Nicholas Joint United Kingdom 10 198 0.7× 101 1.0× 30 0.3× 19 0.2× 36 0.7× 56 336
Ann Okerson United States 11 229 0.8× 34 0.3× 62 0.6× 53 0.7× 44 0.8× 55 357
Sheridan Brown United Kingdom 10 284 0.9× 25 0.2× 291 2.9× 68 0.8× 169 3.3× 14 542
Danny Kingsley Australia 9 120 0.4× 23 0.2× 104 1.0× 18 0.2× 66 1.3× 29 312
Nancy Fried Foster United States 5 195 0.7× 41 0.4× 99 1.0× 14 0.2× 53 1.0× 11 312
Christian Schlögl Austria 8 117 0.4× 33 0.3× 118 1.2× 19 0.2× 33 0.6× 35 325
Xiaotian Chen United States 11 146 0.5× 37 0.4× 83 0.8× 20 0.3× 59 1.1× 38 363
Kenning Arlitsch United States 12 248 0.8× 60 0.6× 89 0.9× 16 0.2× 72 1.4× 38 412

Countries citing papers authored by Deborah D. Blecic

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Deborah D. Blecic's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deborah D. Blecic with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deborah D. Blecic more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Deborah D. Blecic

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deborah D. Blecic. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deborah D. Blecic. The network helps show where Deborah D. Blecic may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Deborah D. Blecic

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Deborah D. Blecic. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Deborah D. Blecic based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Deborah D. Blecic. Deborah D. Blecic is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
1.
Wiberley, Stephen E., Deborah D. Blecic, Sandra L. De Groote, & Mary Shultz. (2023). Publication Patterns of U.S. Academic Librarians and Libraries, 2013–2017 with Comparison to Preceding Studies. College & Research Libraries. 84(4). 2 indexed citations
2.
Blecic, Deborah D., et al.. (2017). Publication Patterns of U.S. Academic Librarians and Libraries from 2003 to 2012. College & Research Libraries. 78(4). 442–442. 23 indexed citations
3.
Groote, Sandra L. De, Mary Shultz, & Deborah D. Blecic. (2014). Information-seeking behavior and the use of online resources: a snapshot of current health sciences faculty. Journal of the Medical Library Association JMLA. 102(3). 169–176. 42 indexed citations
4.
Groote, Sandra L. De, et al.. (2013). Measures of health sciences journal use: a comparison of vendor, link-resolver, and local citation statistics. Journal of the Medical Library Association JMLA. 101(2). 110–119. 13 indexed citations
5.
Blecic, Deborah D., et al.. (2013). Deal or No Deal? Evaluating Big Deals and Their Journals. College & Research Libraries. 74(2). 178–194. 34 indexed citations
6.
Blecic, Deborah D., et al.. (2007). Scholarly communication education initiatives. 7 indexed citations
7.
Blecic, Deborah D., et al.. (2007). SPEC Kit 299: Scholarly Communication Education Initiatives (August 2007). 5 indexed citations
8.
Blecic, Deborah D., et al.. (2007). Measurement of Use of Electronic Resources: Advances in Use Statistics and Innovations in Resource Functionality. College & Research Libraries. 68(1). 26–44. 28 indexed citations
9.
Blecic, Deborah D., et al.. (2007). Scholarly Communication Education Initiatives (SPEC Kit 299). Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign). 14 indexed citations
10.
Hurd, Julie M., et al.. (2002). A Snapshot of Early Adopters of E-journals: Challenges to the Library. College & Research Libraries. 63(6). 515–526. 50 indexed citations
11.
Hurd, Julie M., Deborah D. Blecic, & Ann E. Robinson. (2001). Performance Measures for Electronic Journals. Science & Technology Libraries. 20(2-3). 57–71. 12 indexed citations
12.
Blecic, Deborah D., et al.. (2001). The Measurement of Use of Web-based Information Resources: An Early Look at Vendor-supplied Data. College & Research Libraries. 62(5). 434–453. 30 indexed citations
13.
Blecic, Deborah D.. (2000). Monograph use at an academic health sciences library: The first three years of shelf life. PubMed. 88(2). 145–51. 18 indexed citations
14.
Blecic, Deborah D. & Ann E. Robinson. (2000). Use of print journals in an intracampus exchange program: implications for service and electronic journal subscriptions.. PubMed. 88(1). 75–7. 2 indexed citations
15.
Blecic, Deborah D., et al.. (1999). Collection development and outsourcing in academic health sciences libraries: a survey of current practices.. PubMed. 87(2). 178–86. 10 indexed citations
16.
Blecic, Deborah D.. (1999). Measurements of journal use: an analysis of the correlations between three methods.. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association. 87(1). 20–5. 38 indexed citations
17.
Blecic, Deborah D., et al.. (1999). A Longitudinal Study of the Effects of OPAC Screen Changes on Searching Behavior and Searcher Success. College & Research Libraries. 60(6). 515–530. 21 indexed citations
18.
Hurd, Julie M., et al.. (1999). Information Use by Molecular Biologists: Implications for Library Collections and Services. College & Research Libraries. 60(1). 31–43. 37 indexed citations
19.
Blecic, Deborah D., et al.. (1998). Using Transaction Log Analysis to Improve OPAC Retrieval Results. College & Research Libraries. 59(1). 39–50. 33 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026